Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 03 Feb 2019 08:10:48 +0100] rev 4387
packaging: fix debian changelog
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 30 Jan 2019 04:45:40 +0100] rev 4386
changelog: add relevant entries
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 18:40:10 +0530] rev 4385
evolve: add test for the case where public divergence on difference parents
This test make sure that public divergence resolution also handle the case when
divergentes changeset does not share the same parent at one end because one end
simply rebase. The other side has actual an actual diff change.
For now this would work only for the case when we need to relocate
the mutable one. Other case is still left to work on.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Mon, 21 Jan 2019 23:06:10 +0530] rev 4384
evolve: update the public divergence resolution logic to cover --continue case
To continue the interrupted evolve in case of public divergence:
we will have to store the node of that public cset which was in
content divergence with the other cset, so that we can perform the
phase divergence resolution between that public cset and a newnode
which is the result of content-divergence resolution.
Added tests reflect the behaviour this patch adds.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Mon, 21 Jan 2019 23:06:34 +0530] rev 4383
evolve: add logic to resolve content-divergence with a public cset
Public content-divergence is the divergence where a cset is content-divergent
with a public cset.
To solve public divergence:
1) perform content-divergent resolution
2) resultant node is phase divergent
3) perform phase divergence resolution
It is the intial logic to solve public divergence.
Next patches will be the covering the cases of:
1) relocation: when we need to relocate to node
2) continue: to add this resolution in case of --continue
3) the case when content-divergence resolution gives a result similar
to public cset.
Added test-evolve-public-content-divergent.t reflect the added behaviour.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:33:19 +0530] rev 4382
evolve: introduce function to create a obsmarker relation even for public cset
To create obsmarkers we use obsolete.createmarkers() function, but because of
security reasons this function refuses to create obsmarkers for public cset.
And we need to create obsmarkers for a public cset while solving public content
divergence. So introducing this function which create a obsmarker relation even
for immutable cset.
Currently this function create obsmarker for a single relation, in contrast of
obsolete.createmarkers() which create markers for multiple relations.
Upcoming pathces will be using this function.
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Tue, 29 Jan 2019 20:45:14 +0800] rev 4381
topic: make ranges work in revset relations like 'foo#stack[1:2]'