readme: update readme for issue 4966

test: back hash change from 'extra' content change out The changesets 13701c3fed9c, 3e907ff1981f and 54394d2aaf5e were introduced to handle a change to the way extra were carried out by various command in core. This had to be backout for 3.7.1 as is broken multiple third party extension. We backout the test update as a result. Core changesets performing the backout: ce9696193175::b698abf971e7

evolve: close transaction if conflict is detected in relocate (issue4966) Before this patch, transaction is aborted, if conflict is detected at merging while "hg evolve". Since 8f2ff40fe9c9 (or 3.6) of Mercurial, aborting transaction discards all dirstate changes inside transaction scope for "transactional dirstate" (see below wiki page for detail about it). https://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/DirstateTransactionPlan Therefore, just aborting transaction causes unchanged (and unexpected) dirstate, even though subsequent commands require dirstate changes while "hg evolve". To keep dirstate changes while "hg evolve", this patch closes current running transaction, if conflict is detected in relocate(), even though exception is raised as usual. Even though "save dirstate and restore it after aborting transaction" like shelve._aborttransaction() of Mercurial can also solve this issue, this patch chose closing transaction for similarity with failure for conflict at "hg unshelve". In addition to it, closing transaction can keep any previous (implicit) changes. In newly added test, there is an additional ancestor revision, which "will be evolved safely". It is used to examine whether failure for conflict doesn't discard already relocated revision(s) while "hg evolve". It is fact for current implementation that "hg evolve" relocates each revisions in separated transactions and already relocated ones are never discarded, even if subsequent relocation fails. Though, this examination is useful to detect unintentional regression in the future.

evolve: remove meaningless transaction nesting Before this patch, functions below nest transaction scope, even though they are invoked only inside a transaction scope created at _solveone(). - _solvebumped() - _solvedivergent() - relocate() via _solveunstable() or _solvebumped() Transaction nesting is useful for localizing "success" (e.g. one scope per commit inside wider scope for multiple committing). But such nesting is redundant for _solveone(), because there is no code path, which causes failure after successfully closing inner transaction(s). In addition to it, this nesting makes it complicated to close current transaction successfully with exception raising inside inner scope, like "hg shelve" at detection of conflicts. "tr.close()" is required at each outer scopes for such case. To remove meaningless transaction nesting, this patch replaces repo.transaction() in functions above by repo.currenttransaction(). This reuses transaction created at _solveone(). This patch also adds 'assert tr' after getting current running transaction, to avoid invocation of functions above without transaction.

evolve: extract logic to new method _evolvemerge This patch introduces a new method _evolvemerge to merge orig to dest in relocate method. This simplifies the code of the method relocate and allows us to re-use it later in the scope of the rework of 'hg evolve --continue'

test: add extra expected output (I forgot to amend...)

inhibit: make bookmark -D work with a list of bookmarks `hg bookmark -D` was not accepting a list of bookmarks. This behavior was inconsistent with the behavior of `hg bookmark -d`, which does accept multiple bookmarks.

touch: prompt the user for what to do with the revived changeset This patch improves our interface for reviving changesets. This patch makes touch not assume that the user wants to create divergence by default and gives a prompt instead. The prompt is skipped for changeset that have no living successor as no divergence would be created by reviving them anyway. To restore the previous behavior, one should now use the --allowdivergence flag. The prompt looks like: [10] <description> reviving this changeset will create divergence unless you make a duplicate. (a)llow divergence or (d)uplicate the changeset? a In further patches we will want to add one more choice to that prompt, for example having a marker between the old and revived nodes but no divergence displayed on the UI.

inhibit: fix compat with rebaseskipobsolete We wrap _computeobsoletenotrebased and _clearrebased to fix the following case: - Assuming that we have markers from revisions of the rebase set and destination set and that these markers are inhibited - At the end of the rebase the nodes are still visible because rebase operate without inhibition and skip these nodes Had we not have those markers to begin with the revisions could be hidden at the end of the rebase. We keep track in repo._obsoletenotrebased of the obsolete commits skipped by the rebase and lift the inhibition at the end of the rebase. We add three test cases to make sure that the edge cases are covered.

test: update with new graft output Graft now has a --continue it seems. We need to update our test output.

merge with stable

tests: fix change to help output Core have made minor update to its documentation.

tests: change some double quotes to single quotes Since hg core change 58f8b29c37ff (minirst: change hgrole to use single quotes, 2016-01-12)

inhibit: fix compatibility with changes in rebase Because we compute the obsolete revisions before calling _computeobsoletenotrebased lifting the inhibition stopped working since 8a8ee8338e6 in core. This patch makes it work again.

inhibit: fix _filterpublic Before this patch, _filterpublic would always filter rep._obsinhibit and not its "nodes" argument. Fortunately, we always called it with repo._obsinhibit as its "nodes" argument!

debian: blacklist test-inhibit.t Since we don't add inhibit to the debian packages, let's not run test-inhibit.t

evolve: duplicate evolution summary entries (issue5014) Since we added summary entries for trouble changesets in core we don't need to display it anymore in evolve for the version of hg with the change. Tested with 3.6.1 and 3.6.2.

merge with stable

merge with the rest of stable

debian: update changelog to 5.2.1

evolve: handle merge commit with single obsolete parent (issue4389) This handles evolving merge commits with a single obsolete parent. Merge commits with two obsolete parents are still unsupported. Note this depends on a change to merge.graft in core. Older versions of mercurial will not have this functionality. Also, test-unstable.t will fail with older versions.

merge with stable

evolve: rewrite help for prune command

evolve: improve help for split command

evolve: improve help for prev, next commands

evolve: improve the confusing docstring for _orderrevs()

evolve: improve help for some debug commands

evolve: scattered typo fixes in comments, docstrings

evolve: extract logic to new method _finalizerelocate This patch introduces a new method _finalizerelocate to finalize current state after merge states in relocate method. This simplifies the code of the method relocate and allows us to modify it later to support a continued keywork to implement evolve state.

evolve: extract logic to new method _relocatecommit This patch introduces a new method _relocatecommit to commit current state after merge states in relocate method. This simplifies the code of the method relocate and allows us to modify it later to support a continued keywork to implement evolve state.

evolve: apply API change to 'merge.update' Mercurial core43c00ca887d1 (future 3.7) changed the signature of the 'mercurial.merge.update', this impact our code so we update it. This

debian: don't refer to deleted tests/run-tests.py in debian/rules tests/run-tests.py was deleted in 25a0c31882df (tests: remove the custom run-tests.py, 2015-11-02), but we still refer to it in debian/rules. Fix by having the user define a HGSRC variable when calling 'debuild' (with e.g '-e HGSRC=~/hg').

prune: changing bookmark argument to be a list Currently prune works with a single bookmark the changes in this patch modifies the prune command to accept a list of bookmarks Also changes to inhibit module which internally calls the cmdprune function. the change is to wrap the bookmark input into a list.

prune: remove a list of bookmarks Currently prune works with a single bookmark, the changes in this patch modifies the prune module to work with a list of bookmarks Building on this we can take a list of bookmarks as input and remove all of them in a single go

test: adapt to fix to "known" wireprotocol command Core fixed a bug in discovery (in b64b6fdc5c9b) and this is showing up in our test output.

evolve: renaming local variables Renaming local variables to be more precise, i want to store a different list of bookmarks(input-list) and it would be hard to understand what marks represents in that change therefore renaming it to repomarks. Renames mark to bookmark, which will make the changes in next patch more understandable, when it is pluraized. Also renames bookmarks (module) to bookmarksmod so as to free up the name when bookmark gets pluralized.

inhibit: backout 23a34dce5131 remove unused bookmark operation wrapping This breaks potentially a lot of things. Let's give a change to extensions maintainers to adapt to the new bookmarks.write api before removing this code right away.

readme: add something about bookmark within transaction

commitwrapper: use bookmarks.recordchange instead of bookmarks.write Before this patch we were using the deprecated API bookmarks.write, this patch replace its usage by the new API call bookmarks.recordchange.

next: replace call to bookmarks.write by bookmarks.recordchange bookmarks.write is now deprecated, we are moving to the new api: bookmarks.recordchange.

previous: replace call to bookmarks.write by bookmarks.recordchange bookmarks.write is now deprecated, we are moving to the new api: bookmarks.recordchange.

prune: use bookmarks.recordchange instead of bookmarks.write Before this patch we were using the deprecated bookmarks.write instead of bookmarks.recordchange in prune

transaction: fix release order in 'rewrite' This was wrong for quite sometime.

check-code: make drophack comply with check-code

check-code: make directaccess.py comply with check-code

check-code: make inhibit.py comply with check-code

check-code: make obsolete.py comply with check-code

check-code: make pushexperiment.py comply with check-code

check-code: make simple4server.py comply with check-code

check-code: make evolve.py comply with check-code

evolve: fix test-inhibit to match latest hg When I fixed an issue in core about rebaseset 40a2f972f26d (that I introduced before), it restored the original behavior of inhibit with rebase. This patch fixes test-inhibit to match the latest hg.

evolve: fix test-stabilize-conflict.t to match new extra computation in core Recent patches changed the way we compute extras for rebase and graft. This changes the hashes in evolve's tests. This patch fixes the test test-stabilize-conflict.t.

evolve: fix test-sharing.t to match new extra computation in core Recent patches changed the way we compute extras for rebase and graft. This changes the hashes in evolve's tests. This patch fixes the test test-sharing.t

evolve: fix test-tutorial.t to match new extra computation in core Recent patches changed the way we compute extras for rebase and graft. This changes the hashes in evolve's tests. This patch fixes the test test-tutorial.t

inhibit: make rebase see obsolescence even for visible nodes Rebase changed recently to take advantage of obsolescence markers to reduce the number of conflicts to resolve. Inhibit users were unable to leverage this new feature because none of their visible nodes could be obsolete. This patch makes the nodes that would be obsolete without inhibit, actually obsolete for the duration of the rebase to take advantage of the feature mentioned before.

inhibit: remove unused bookmark operation wrapping Before this patch, inhibit was wrapping bookmarks.write and bookmarks.recordchange. Since all the usage of bookmarks.write are not replaced by bookmarks.recordchange all bookmarks operation happen in a transaction. Inhibit already wraps the transaction mechanism to make sure that no revision can end up being obsolete and visible. This makes the wrapping of bookmarks.write superfluous. Wrapping bookmarks.recordchange was wrong in the first place and redundant with wrapping transactions.