evolve: Changelog

test: back hash change from 'extra' content change out The changesets 13701c3fed9c, 3e907ff1981f and 54394d2aaf5e were introduced to handle a change to the way extra were carried out by various command in core. This had to be backout for 3.7.1 as is broken multiple third party extension. We backout the test update as a result. Core changesets performing the backout: ce9696193175::b698abf971e7

evolve: close transaction if conflict is detected in relocate (issue4966) Before this patch, transaction is aborted, if conflict is detected at merging while "hg evolve". Since 8f2ff40fe9c9 (or 3.6) of Mercurial, aborting transaction discards all dirstate changes inside transaction scope for "transactional dirstate" (see below wiki page for detail about it). https://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/DirstateTransactionPlan Therefore, just aborting transaction causes unchanged (and unexpected) dirstate, even though subsequent commands require dirstate changes while "hg evolve". To keep dirstate changes while "hg evolve", this patch closes current running transaction, if conflict is detected in relocate(), even though exception is raised as usual. Even though "save dirstate and restore it after aborting transaction" like shelve._aborttransaction() of Mercurial can also solve this issue, this patch chose closing transaction for similarity with failure for conflict at "hg unshelve". In addition to it, closing transaction can keep any previous (implicit) changes. In newly added test, there is an additional ancestor revision, which "will be evolved safely". It is used to examine whether failure for conflict doesn't discard already relocated revision(s) while "hg evolve". It is fact for current implementation that "hg evolve" relocates each revisions in separated transactions and already relocated ones are never discarded, even if subsequent relocation fails. Though, this examination is useful to detect unintentional regression in the future.

evolve: remove meaningless transaction nesting Before this patch, functions below nest transaction scope, even though they are invoked only inside a transaction scope created at _solveone(). - _solvebumped() - _solvedivergent() - relocate() via _solveunstable() or _solvebumped() Transaction nesting is useful for localizing "success" (e.g. one scope per commit inside wider scope for multiple committing). But such nesting is redundant for _solveone(), because there is no code path, which causes failure after successfully closing inner transaction(s). In addition to it, this nesting makes it complicated to close current transaction successfully with exception raising inside inner scope, like "hg shelve" at detection of conflicts. "tr.close()" is required at each outer scopes for such case. To remove meaningless transaction nesting, this patch replaces repo.transaction() in functions above by repo.currenttransaction(). This reuses transaction created at _solveone(). This patch also adds 'assert tr' after getting current running transaction, to avoid invocation of functions above without transaction.

evolve: extract logic to new method _evolvemerge This patch introduces a new method _evolvemerge to merge orig to dest in relocate method. This simplifies the code of the method relocate and allows us to re-use it later in the scope of the rework of 'hg evolve --continue'

test: add extra expected output (I forgot to amend...)

inhibit: make bookmark -D work with a list of bookmarks `hg bookmark -D` was not accepting a list of bookmarks. This behavior was inconsistent with the behavior of `hg bookmark -d`, which does accept multiple bookmarks.

touch: prompt the user for what to do with the revived changeset This patch improves our interface for reviving changesets. This patch makes touch not assume that the user wants to create divergence by default and gives a prompt instead. The prompt is skipped for changeset that have no living successor as no divergence would be created by reviving them anyway. To restore the previous behavior, one should now use the --allowdivergence flag. The prompt looks like: [10] <description> reviving this changeset will create divergence unless you make a duplicate. (a)llow divergence or (d)uplicate the changeset? a In further patches we will want to add one more choice to that prompt, for example having a marker between the old and revived nodes but no divergence displayed on the UI.

inhibit: fix compat with rebaseskipobsolete We wrap _computeobsoletenotrebased and _clearrebased to fix the following case: - Assuming that we have markers from revisions of the rebase set and destination set and that these markers are inhibited - At the end of the rebase the nodes are still visible because rebase operate without inhibition and skip these nodes Had we not have those markers to begin with the revisions could be hidden at the end of the rebase. We keep track in repo._obsoletenotrebased of the obsolete commits skipped by the rebase and lift the inhibition at the end of the rebase. We add three test cases to make sure that the edge cases are covered.