Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:51:26 -0700 split: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:51:26 -0700] rev 3567
split: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:51:17 -0700 prune: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:51:17 -0700] rev 3566
prune: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:51:07 -0700 metaedit: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:51:07 -0700] rev 3565
metaedit: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:50:59 -0700 fold: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:50:59 -0700] rev 3564
fold: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:50:45 -0700 uncommit: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:50:45 -0700] rev 3563
uncommit: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:40:28 -0700 evolve: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:40:28 -0700] rev 3562
evolve: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:50:25 -0700 amend: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:50:25 -0700] rev 3561
amend: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers This is for the legacy handling support for "hg commit --amend" case. I picked "amend" because it feels more natural than "commit". Besides, and more importantly, that's consistent what core uses.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:22:27 -0700 compat: add wrapper for obsolete.createmarkers() that accepts "operation" arg
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:22:27 -0700] rev 3560
compat: add wrapper for obsolete.createmarkers() that accepts "operation" arg I want to start passing the operation argument, but hg < 4.3 does not support it, so we need a compat wrapper. For older hg, the operation is simply ignored.
Mon, 12 Mar 2018 23:26:25 -0700 tests: do not glob out fixed dates
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 23:26:25 -0700] rev 3559
tests: do not glob out fixed dates Perhaps these dates historically have not been fixed, but they seem to be now. I got tired of not being able to use "run-tests.py -i".
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:00:01 +0530 evolve: de-duplicate some function calls
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:00:01 +0530] rev 3558
evolve: de-duplicate some function calls _cleanup() was called in continueevolve() and evolve() function too. Let's call it at a single place for both the cases. Also call progresscb() outside of conditionals to call it both times.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:11:22 +0530 evolve: move deletion of evolvestate out of continueevolve() function
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:11:22 +0530] rev 3557
evolve: move deletion of evolvestate out of continueevolve() function We need to extract some data at evolve() function from evolvestate.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:04:28 +0530 evolve: load evolvestate before passing to continueevolve()
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:04:28 +0530] rev 3556
evolve: load evolvestate before passing to continueevolve() This patch moves some code from continueevolve() to evolve() function so that we have a loaded evolvestate present in the evolve() function for post processing.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:56:05 +0530 evolve: move the handling for non-continue part in else conditional
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:56:05 +0530] rev 3555
evolve: move the handling for non-continue part in else conditional This will help us do factor out which operations we want to do for continue, which for non-continue and which operations we want to do for both of them.
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 21:21:10 +0530 evolve: move the logic of continuation handling of `hg evolve` in own fn
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 14 Mar 2018 21:21:10 +0530] rev 3554
evolve: move the logic of continuation handling of `hg evolve` in own fn The function which defines the evolve command is pretty big with all the logic messed up there. It's better to have individual functions for individual uses. The movement of code will help in adding more logic to continue part in clean way. Moreover for implementing `hg continue`, we need all continuation handling in their own functions, so it will help there too.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:24:56 +0530 CHANGELOG: add an entry about next and prev being interactive
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:24:56 +0530] rev 3553
CHANGELOG: add an entry about next and prev being interactive
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:24:57 +0530 prev: show changeset hash in --dry-run instead of rev numbers
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:24:57 +0530] rev 3552
prev: show changeset hash in --dry-run instead of rev numbers rev numbers can change, so it's better to show changeset hash.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:13:21 +0530 prev: prompt user to choose parent in case of multiple parents
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:13:21 +0530] rev 3551
prev: prompt user to choose parent in case of multiple parents This patch adds functionality to `hg prev` to prompt user to choose one parent to update when multiple parents exist. Surprisingly there were no tests for this case before this patch, I added one with this patch.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:48:03 +0530 next: cleanup logic around return by returning early
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:48:03 +0530] rev 3550
next: cleanup logic around return by returning early In the cmdnext function, there are some conditionals which returns early and some which sets a result value to be returned later. Let's return from all the conditionals early. There are if, elif and else involved, so it's sure we will end up in one of the conditional, each conditional will return, so it's guranteed that we are returning the correct value and returning everytime.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:14:39 +0530 next: prompt user to choose child in ambiguity in `hg next --evolve`
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:14:39 +0530] rev 3549
next: prompt user to choose child in ambiguity in `hg next --evolve` This patch makes `hg next --evolve` prompt user to choose a child to evolve and update when multiple of them exists. This is improvement over previous behavior where we used to error out saying ambiguous next unstable changeset and told user to manually use `hg evolve -r rev`. While writing this patch, I am personally very happy to have this feature as I have encountered this stage many times and I wanted `next --evolve` to take care of that. It uses the revselectionprompt thing added in earlier patches.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:56:50 +0530 next: move logic to evolve the children to it's own function
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:56:50 +0530] rev 3548
next: move logic to evolve the children to it's own function This patch moves the logic which evolves the children and updates to it in `hg next --evolve` to it's own function as we want to use that again.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:46:47 +0530 next: prompt user to choose a children in case of ambiguity
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:46:47 +0530] rev 3547
next: prompt user to choose a children in case of ambiguity This patch adds functionality to prompt user and ask the children to which next should move to incase of multiple childrens. This is a very nice UI because otherwise user has to lookup changeset hash, and then manually do `hg update` to that. In this case we show hash and description so user can choose which one to update easily. It is using the interactive revision choosing functionality added in a previous patch.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:31:13 +0530 next: show changeset hash in `--dry-run` instead of rev numbers
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:31:13 +0530] rev 3546
next: show changeset hash in `--dry-run` instead of rev numbers Rev numbers can change, hence we should show rev hash instead of rev numbers in dry-run.
Sun, 18 Mar 2018 01:27:02 +0530 evolve: make sure we consider all cases in if-else
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 18 Mar 2018 01:27:02 +0530] rev 3545
evolve: make sure we consider all cases in if-else The part of code which is touched decides on evolution of merge changeset. We need proper handling of each case there, so before adding logic, let's add conditional for each case so that upcoming patches are easy to understand.
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:03:41 +0100 tests: add more cases about stabilization of an orphaned merge commit
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:03:41 +0100] rev 3544
tests: add more cases about stabilization of an orphaned merge commit This patch adds three more cases related to stabilization of orphaned merge commits.
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:47:07 +0100 evolve: fix missing negation
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:47:07 +0100] rev 3543
evolve: fix missing negation Spotted by Pulkit Goyal.
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:01:07 +0100 evolve: clarify message for ambiguous destination from split
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:01:07 +0100] rev 3542
evolve: clarify message for ambiguous destination from split Message is a bit long, but should be less scary.
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:24:22 +0530 evolve: prompt user to select destination for stabilization in case of split
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:24:22 +0530] rev 3541
evolve: prompt user to select destination for stabilization in case of split This patch adds functionality to prompt user to select a revision when there exists multiple stabilization destination because of split on multiple branches. Test are also added for the feature. I am not sure whether this is the best message which we can show, if people have suggestions I will like to improve the messages shown in prompt.
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:36:35 +0530 tests: remove some tests which are moved to dedicated files
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:36:35 +0530] rev 3540
tests: remove some tests which are moved to dedicated files The tests in test-unstable.t files are now moved to their dedicated file with all the cases to that in that file. Let's delete them from here.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:24:35 +0530 next: factor out the logic to update to changeset in another function
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:24:35 +0530] rev 3539
next: factor out the logic to update to changeset in another function This patch moves the logic to update to children changeset during `hg next` in a separate function because we want to re-use the logic when we will prompt user to choose a changeset in case of multiple childrens.
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:59:53 +0530 utility: add a function to prompt user to choose a revision
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:59:53 +0530] rev 3538
utility: add a function to prompt user to choose a revision This patch adds a utility function to interactively prompt user to choose a revision to proceed in cases when there are multiple revisions which are candidates. The function will be used in `hg evolve`, `hg next`, `hg prev` etc. If user feedback will be good, I plan to move it to core and use it at more possible places.
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -30 +30 +50 +100 +300 +1000 tip