Sun, 02 Jul 2017 13:48:45 +0200 template: handle lack of "users" in the obsfate data
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 02 Jul 2017 13:48:45 +0200] rev 2690
template: handle lack of "users" in the obsfate data This can happens when their are no markers (or the markers has no user data?)
Fri, 30 Jun 2017 16:29:26 +0200 doc: update effect flag documentation
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 30 Jun 2017 16:29:26 +0200] rev 2689
doc: update effect flag documentation
Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:20:08 +0200 obsfate: override the default log output
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:20:08 +0200] rev 2688
obsfate: override the default log output Override the default log output by showing obsfate if not empty.
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 23:42:29 +0200 evolve: fix documentation formatting
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 29 Jun 2017 23:42:29 +0200] rev 2687
evolve: fix documentation formatting The config example were formatted as standard paragraph.
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:22:06 +0200 compat: fix topicset for mercurial 4.1
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:22:06 +0200] rev 2686
compat: fix topicset for mercurial 4.1 The 'getrevset' method is not available there.
Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:19:03 +0200 obsfate: refactor obsfate data computing
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:19:03 +0200] rev 2685
obsfate: refactor obsfate data computing Refactor how obsfate data are computed in order to reuse this logic later when hooking on default log output.
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:49:33 +0200 topic: exclude public and topic changeset from branch stack
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:49:33 +0200] rev 2684
topic: exclude public and topic changeset from branch stack Stack use-case is to show the current work in progress, which are symbolized by the phase draft and secret phase. Moreover showing public changesets in stack output when displaying current branch would display a lot of changesets for long-lived branches and would be quite useless. We also exclude topic changeset form the stack since they already exist on their own stack. getstack revsets didn't needed update when displaying a topic as when a changeset become public, its topic is no longer relevant.
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:29:08 +0200 tests: use a more portable form for new lines
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:29:08 +0200] rev 2683
tests: use a more portable form for new lines
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 02:21:09 +0530 topic: don't abort if there is no current topic in stack() revset
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 29 Jun 2017 02:21:09 +0530] rev 2682
topic: don't abort if there is no current topic in stack() revset Named branches support has been added and we should not abort if there is no active topic.
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 01:58:26 +0530 topics: return a parse error if stack() revset is passed with argument
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 29 Jun 2017 01:58:26 +0530] rev 2681
topics: return a parse error if stack() revset is passed with argument
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 tip