Mon, 04 Jun 2018 04:03:02 +0530 evolve: prompt user for branch selection while resolving content-divergence
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 04 Jun 2018 04:03:02 +0530] rev 3790
evolve: prompt user for branch selection while resolving content-divergence When resolving content-divergence, there can be case when both the content-divergent changesets are on different named branches. In that case, we are not sure which branch should the resolution commit should be on. This patch adds logic to prompt user to choose the branch which the resolution commit should be on and then creates the new resolution commit on that branch. This also adds a new test file which have tests for the branch selection feature we have added.
Tue, 05 Jun 2018 03:51:01 +0530 evolve: pass the base revision in _completecontentdivergent()
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 05 Jun 2018 03:51:01 +0530] rev 3789
evolve: pass the base revision in _completecontentdivergent() We need the base revision to merge commit messages, branches and more stuff. Let's make sure we have that by passing into the function which completes the divergence resolution.
Tue, 05 Jun 2018 03:49:49 +0530 evolve: store the base of content-divergents in evolvestate
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 05 Jun 2018 03:49:49 +0530] rev 3788
evolve: store the base of content-divergents in evolvestate We need the base changeset for merging commit messages, branches. Let's store it in evolvestate.
Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:53:21 +0530 evolve: use cmdrewrite.amend() instead of creating a new commit
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:53:21 +0530] rev 3787
evolve: use cmdrewrite.amend() instead of creating a new commit This patch backs out changeset 88601e1cd5d8. We replaced cmdrewrite.amend() with creating new commit because using amend(), a high level function was not good and creating a new commit gave us more control over things. **HOWEVER** to get more control, you need to get arrange all the pieces together perfectly. Creating a new commit, the existing logic has some bugs around dirstate handling, the `repo.dirstate.setparents()` call especially. Sometimes this fixes the dirstate correctly sometimes not. As Pierre-Yves David said, "Having a "clumsy" implementation with the right behavior is usually a good first step. So having an amend based implementation seems like a good first step.", let's take a step back and get back using amend so that we can have a correct basic implementation which is bug free.
Sun, 03 Jun 2018 01:59:41 +0530 corecompat: update the tests output to show phase update summary
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 03 Jun 2018 01:59:41 +0530] rev 3786
corecompat: update the tests output to show phase update summary eb9835014d20 in core added support to transactions to show a summary on the phase changed during that transaction. Due to this, couple of tests output needs to be updated. This patch does that. While realeasing evolve, this patch should be backed out on branches where hg<=4.6. CORE-TEST-OUTPUT-UPDATE: eb9835014d20
Sun, 03 Jun 2018 03:24:43 +0530 CHANGELOG: add an entry about issue 5808 being fixed stable
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 03 Jun 2018 03:24:43 +0530] rev 3785
CHANGELOG: add an entry about issue 5808 being fixed
Sun, 03 Jun 2018 03:21:25 +0530 next-prev: replace the error hint to mention about `--merge` flag stable
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 03 Jun 2018 03:21:25 +0530] rev 3784
next-prev: replace the error hint to mention about `--merge` flag
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 tip