Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:22:18 +0530 evolve: remove the unnecessary condition to check empty successors set
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:22:18 +0530] rev 5012
evolve: remove the unnecessary condition to check empty successors set I annotated the history of this "newer == [()]" condition and found that it was added in the initial stages of evolution project (more than 8 years ago) and there is no test where we get [()] as a successor set. So looks like "if not newer" is enough to check if it is empty. I also looked into obsutil.successorssets() implementation and I don't think it would give us [()] in any case.
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -1 +1 +10 +30 +100 +300 tip