Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:56:05 +0800 evolve: remove unused StringIO import
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:56:05 +0800] rev 4404
evolve: remove unused StringIO import
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:39:10 +0800 evolve: unindent some lines caught by flake8
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:39:10 +0800] rev 4403
evolve: unindent some lines caught by flake8 The message was: "E117 over-indented".
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 12:46:57 +0100 branching: overwrite broken merge with a correct one
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 13 Feb 2019 12:46:57 +0100] rev 4402
branching: overwrite broken merge with a correct one Thanks goes to Anton Shestakov for spotting and fixing this.
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 19:18:17 +0800 branching: merge with stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 13 Feb 2019 19:18:17 +0800] rev 4401
branching: merge with stable
Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:03:14 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:03:14 +0100] rev 4400
branching: merge with stable
Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:33:02 +0800 obshistory: omit keyword arguments with default values in patch.diffui() calls stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:33:02 +0800] rev 4399
obshistory: omit keyword arguments with default values in patch.diffui() calls d4c9eebdd72d made that function not take "relroot" and "prefix" anymore, and instead expect "pathfn". These two chunks of code in this patch simply generate patches for obslog -p and they broke because they tried to provide default values for "prefix" and "relroot" for no apparent reason (and also for "changes"). Let's instead rely on defaults of patch.diffui().
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 17:52:49 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 17:52:49 +0100] rev 4398
branching: merge with stable
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:21:09 +0100 test: wider another time matching in prev/next lock testing stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:21:09 +0100] rev 4397
test: wider another time matching in prev/next lock testing There does not seems to be a reasons for specifically matching 4-6 seconds. Wider matching will avoid intermittent failure.
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:29:54 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:29:54 +0100] rev 4396
branching: merge with stable
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:26:48 +0100 test: wider time matching in prev/next lock testing stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:26:48 +0100] rev 4395
test: wider time matching in prev/next lock testing There does not seems to be a reasons for specifically matching 4-6 seconds. Wider matching will avoid intermittent failure.
Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:00:46 +0000 topic: make topics compatible with branchmap refactor
Martijn Pieters <mj@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:00:46 +0000] rev 4394
topic: make topics compatible with branchmap refactor See https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5290
Wed, 30 Jan 2019 10:03:00 -0800 prompts: use 1-indexing in revselectionprompt()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 30 Jan 2019 10:03:00 -0800] rev 4393
prompts: use 1-indexing in revselectionprompt() The consumer is generally a human, not a computer. I've made the mistake of entering "1" instead of "0" a few times myself.
Thu, 07 Feb 2019 16:24:59 +0800 test-split: split now ignores diff.* settings
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Thu, 07 Feb 2019 16:24:59 +0800] rev 4392
test-split: split now ignores diff.* settings From 66399f2e92aa: "It is assumed by the author that the `[diff]` section is primarily for *viewing* diffs, and that it is unlikely what people intend when attempting to commit or revert."
Sun, 03 Feb 2019 17:03:02 +0530 pick: add --tool for hg pick to specify mergetool
Sangeet Kumar Mishra <mail2sangeetmishra@gmail.com> [Sun, 03 Feb 2019 17:03:02 +0530] rev 4391
pick: add --tool for hg pick to specify mergetool This patch used configuration override to enable you to pass a mergetool via the --tool flag in case there is any merge conflict.
Wed, 06 Feb 2019 13:49:29 +0800 revset: use getintrange() to parse relation subscript
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 06 Feb 2019 13:49:29 +0800] rev 4390
revset: use getintrange() to parse relation subscript After 13f7a6a4f0db parsing the tokens into usable values needs to happen inside subscript relation functions.
Sun, 03 Feb 2019 12:04:50 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 03 Feb 2019 12:04:50 +0100] rev 4389
branching: merge with stable
Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:38:48 +0530 compat: pass contexts to _findlimit() (issue6066) stable
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:38:48 +0530] rev 4388
compat: pass contexts to _findlimit() (issue6066) Now _findlimit() in copies module accept context instead of rev number. See https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5595
Sun, 03 Feb 2019 08:10:48 +0100 packaging: fix debian changelog stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 03 Feb 2019 08:10:48 +0100] rev 4387
packaging: fix debian changelog
Wed, 30 Jan 2019 04:45:40 +0100 changelog: add relevant entries
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 30 Jan 2019 04:45:40 +0100] rev 4386
changelog: add relevant entries
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 18:40:10 +0530 evolve: add test for the case where public divergence on difference parents
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 18:40:10 +0530] rev 4385
evolve: add test for the case where public divergence on difference parents This test make sure that public divergence resolution also handle the case when divergentes changeset does not share the same parent at one end because one end simply rebase. The other side has actual an actual diff change. For now this would work only for the case when we need to relocate the mutable one. Other case is still left to work on.
Mon, 21 Jan 2019 23:06:10 +0530 evolve: update the public divergence resolution logic to cover --continue case
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Mon, 21 Jan 2019 23:06:10 +0530] rev 4384
evolve: update the public divergence resolution logic to cover --continue case To continue the interrupted evolve in case of public divergence: we will have to store the node of that public cset which was in content divergence with the other cset, so that we can perform the phase divergence resolution between that public cset and a newnode which is the result of content-divergence resolution. Added tests reflect the behaviour this patch adds.
Mon, 21 Jan 2019 23:06:34 +0530 evolve: add logic to resolve content-divergence with a public cset
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Mon, 21 Jan 2019 23:06:34 +0530] rev 4383
evolve: add logic to resolve content-divergence with a public cset Public content-divergence is the divergence where a cset is content-divergent with a public cset. To solve public divergence: 1) perform content-divergent resolution 2) resultant node is phase divergent 3) perform phase divergence resolution It is the intial logic to solve public divergence. Next patches will be the covering the cases of: 1) relocation: when we need to relocate to node 2) continue: to add this resolution in case of --continue 3) the case when content-divergence resolution gives a result similar to public cset. Added test-evolve-public-content-divergent.t reflect the added behaviour.
Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:33:19 +0530 evolve: introduce function to create a obsmarker relation even for public cset
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:33:19 +0530] rev 4382
evolve: introduce function to create a obsmarker relation even for public cset To create obsmarkers we use obsolete.createmarkers() function, but because of security reasons this function refuses to create obsmarkers for public cset. And we need to create obsmarkers for a public cset while solving public content divergence. So introducing this function which create a obsmarker relation even for immutable cset. Currently this function create obsmarker for a single relation, in contrast of obsolete.createmarkers() which create markers for multiple relations. Upcoming pathces will be using this function.
Tue, 29 Jan 2019 20:45:14 +0800 topic: make ranges work in revset relations like 'foo#stack[1:2]'
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Tue, 29 Jan 2019 20:45:14 +0800] rev 4381
topic: make ranges work in revset relations like 'foo#stack[1:2]'
Mon, 28 Jan 2019 22:31:31 +0800 topic: simplify #stack index check/access
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Mon, 28 Jan 2019 22:31:31 +0800] rev 4380
topic: simplify #stack index check/access Also using stack.revs instead of list(stack). It's equivalent and stack.revs is @propertycache'd.
Sun, 27 Jan 2019 17:39:09 +0800 topic: make ranges work in revset relations like 'foo#topic[1:2]'
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sun, 27 Jan 2019 17:39:09 +0800] rev 4379
topic: make ranges work in revset relations like 'foo#topic[1:2]' Since #topic is very similar to #generations, we reuse the function directly. Few tests because #generations is already tested in core.
Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:51:36 +0530 evolve: add description of function solveobswdp
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:51:36 +0530] rev 4378
evolve: add description of function solveobswdp
Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:11:36 -0800 evolve: document the "if not shouldupdate" block
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:11:36 -0800] rev 4377
evolve: document the "if not shouldupdate" block I missed the "not" in "if not shouldupdate: ... hg.updaterepo()" and it took a long time for me to realize it's about updating *back* to the original commit (or to its successor). Let's add a comment to maybe help the person not make the same mistake.
Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:55:20 -0800 evolve: make "startnode" consistently be a node, not a context
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:55:20 -0800] rev 4376
evolve: make "startnode" consistently be a node, not a context This fixes a bug where we didn't print "working directory is not at ..." after `hg evolve --continue` because we were comparing a node and a context.
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:36:29 -0800 evolve: use context managers for locks and transaction
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:36:29 -0800] rev 4375
evolve: use context managers for locks and transaction
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:17:58 -0800 prune: use scmutil.cleanupnodes()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:17:58 -0800] rev 4374
prune: use scmutil.cleanupnodes()
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:45:16 -0800 uncommit: use scmtutil.cleanupnodes()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:45:16 -0800] rev 4373
uncommit: use scmtutil.cleanupnodes()
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -32 +32 +50 +100 +300 tip