Wed, 17 May 2017 00:23:19 +0200 obshashrange: to not overwrite the list with the set
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 17 May 2017 00:23:19 +0200] rev 2371
obshashrange: to not overwrite the list with the set We reusing the list variable lower in the code.
Wed, 17 May 2017 00:22:24 +0200 obshashrange: properly break out of the two loops
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 17 May 2017 00:22:24 +0200] rev 2370
obshashrange: properly break out of the two loops Otherwise we would continue to iterate even after we reseted the cache.
Wed, 17 May 2017 00:21:30 +0200 obshashrange: fix reset conditional
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 17 May 2017 00:21:30 +0200] rev 2369
obshashrange: fix reset conditional If the revision is in "revs" we should not reset the cache. The old code was wrong (Thanks goes to new tests for catching this).
Tue, 16 May 2017 11:21:41 +0200 cache: ensure we warm stablerange cache before the obshashrange cache
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 16 May 2017 11:21:41 +0200] rev 2368
cache: ensure we warm stablerange cache before the obshashrange cache I've been seeing traceback that seems to be happening because of issues in this area.
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -4 +4 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 tip