Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 18:03:32 +0200] rev 2611
obsfate: display more data about direct prune markers
This does not handle all cases, but this should handle the most common ones.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:58:17 +0200] rev 2610
obsfate: split markers fetch from successor set annotation
This will help to improve support for pruned changesets.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:55:55 +0200] rev 2609
obsfate: mark successorsetallmarkers public
We are about to use it in another module.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:54:27 +0200] rev 2608
obsfate: mark 'preparesuccessorset' as public
It is used in another module so it is not really private.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:51:31 +0200] rev 2607
obsfate: use 'split' as verb when appropriate
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:50:11 +0200] rev 2606
obsfate: improve prune support in _successorsetverb
In the prune case, still have markers (at least the prune markers). If we want
to be able to return these markers we need the underlying function to support
it.