Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:52:14 +0530] rev 3915
CHANGELOG: add some entries and remove duplicated entries
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:52:06 +0200] rev 3914
branching: merge default into stable
The stable branch of Mercurial core now contains Mercurial 4.7 so evolve branch
policy requires this merge. The @ bookmark is in the right location, so people
doing clone will get to the latest release.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:07:39 +0200] rev 3913
branching: merge with the other head
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:48:15 +0200] rev 3912
test-compat: backed out changeset 8fe8152ff071
These output change were for 4.7 only.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:47:20 +0200] rev 3911
test-compat: backed out changeset 41fc764bf28c
These output change are for mercurial-4.7 only
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:46:30 +0200] rev 3910
test-compat: backed out changeset dda5b2134b32
These change were for Mercurial 4.7 only.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:45:01 +0200] rev 3909
test-compat: backout change to 1e103c7f7663
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:25:57 +0200] rev 3908
compat: use older API for older version
This API changed in 4.7, we need to adjust.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:28:19 +0200] rev 3907
branching: create mercurial-4.6 branch for updated test output
This branch will be used to check for 4.6 compatibility.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 16:12:01 -0700] rev 3906
builddependencies: extract function for getting successors
The code no longer makes a difference between single- and
mult-successor cases and just needs a set (or generator, really) of
successors to iterate over. Let's extract that into a function.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 16:23:25 -0700] rev 3905
builddependencies: share code between single- and multi-successor cases
The two cases now have more similar structure ("if succ in revs:
dependencies[r].add(succ)"), so let's share the code so it doesn't
start drifting apart again.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:33:48 -0700] rev 3904
builddependencies: build inverse dict from forward dict
It's error-prone to keep "dependencies" and "rdependencies" in sync
(we don't do it correctly when there are multiple successors or a
node). It's easier to just create "rependencies" from "dependencies"
after it's complete.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:21:49 -0700] rev 3903
builddependencies: remove a use of defaultdict
I don't see much reason to make "rdependencies" be a defaultdict when
"dependencies" is not. It's easy to initialize each entry ourselves.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:03:35 +0200] rev 3902
branching: merge with stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:30:37 -0700] rev 3901
builddependencies: don't remove found deps when divergence found (issue5946)
It seems obviously wrong to not keep any dependencies for a revision
that we had already found (for p1) if we run into divergence (from
p2). It also happens to fix issue5946 :)
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:47:16 -0700] rev 3900
builddependencies: don't add dependency on revision outside input set
This was already handled in the single-successor case, but had been
missed in the multiple-successors case.
Note that there seems to be a copy of builddependencies() in the
topics extension. I don't use topics more than I have to, so I'll let
someone else fix that code.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:16:25 -0700] rev 3899
builddependencies: consider all divergent successors
We were only considering one. In test-evolve-abort-conentdiv.t:165,
the input revs were {5, 8} and dependency dict was {8: set([]), 5:
set([10])}, which is a little weird (10 is not in the input set). It
still worked because the callers used it (they seemed to only care if
there were *any* dependencies).
This patch fixes the issue by considering all successors. That means
the dependency dict will be {8: set([]), 5: set([8, 10])} after this
patch. The next patch will remove the 10 from that set.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:00:49 -0700] rev 3898
tests: add test for issue5946
The test case is a copy of the one for 5833. The only difference is
that the merge parents are recorded in the opposite order (and that
the test is truncated because it fails).
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 25 May 2018 17:17:56 +0200] rev 3897
obslog: check filtered output with folded changesets
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 25 May 2018 16:50:04 +0200] rev 3896
obslog: check filtered output with splitted changesets
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 25 May 2018 11:52:48 +0200] rev 3895
obslog: check filtered output with pruned changesets
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 16:48:35 +0200] rev 3894
obslog: check filtered output with amended changesets
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 25 May 2018 11:48:19 +0200] rev 3893
tests: add a content-divergent obshistory test
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:44:05 +0200] rev 3892
tests: extract the obshistory amend then fold test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:42:56 +0200] rev 3891
tests: extract the content-divergence test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:41:57 +0200] rev 3890
tests: extract the obshistory fold test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:40:56 +0200] rev 3889
tests: extract the obshistory lots of split test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:37:51 +0200] rev 3888
tests: extract the obshistory split test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:37:40 +0200] rev 3887
tests: extract the obshistory prune test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 15:40:29 +0200] rev 3886
tests: extract the obshistory amend test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 15:35:54 +0200] rev 3885
tests: extract obshistory setup in a separate file
We are gonna soon explode the obshistory test file into several, extract the
setup to reuse it as much as possible.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 12:07:24 +0200] rev 3884
obslog: add a new flag to filter out non-local nodes
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:28:44 +0200] rev 3883
compat: drop compatibility hack for mercurial <4.3
We no longer support version prior 4.3.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sat, 21 Jul 2018 02:42:29 +0530] rev 3882
compat: temporarily move copies fix to compat.py
This patch moves a fixed version of copies._fullcopytracing() to compat.py as
this was not fixed in core before release and also we need to do this anyway for
the older versions of mercurial.
This fix is that when base changeset is not ancestor of any of the merging
commits, we don't throw an error.
The phabricator differential which will fix this in core is
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3896.
This fixes the traceback we get in previous changeset while relocating one of
the content-divergent changeset.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Jun 2018 18:18:30 +0530] rev 3881
evolve: continue conflicted relocation content-divergence
This patch adds logic to continue an conflicted content-divergence resolution
which was interrupted while relocating one of the divergent commits.
The tests shows the there is some mishandling of copies internally which will be
fixed in next patch.
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 18 Jul 2018 18:17:16 +0800] rev 3880
topic: use self instead of repo in topicrepo methods
Referring to repo here was somehow preventing it from being garbage-collected
(important in hgweb, where currently every request gets a new repo).
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 08 Jul 2018 22:16:17 +0530] rev 3879
evolvecmd: introduce fn to be wrapped by extensions resolving content-div
The function added will be used by extension by wrapping it and adding logic to
merge data introduced by them. For example: topic extension can wrap this
function and add logic to merge topic names.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 08 Jul 2018 21:18:33 +0530] rev 3878
evolvecmd: move remaining logic to merge commit desc to existing utility fn
This was a bit awful because we had a utility function and still we did some of
merging outside of that fn. So let's move the remaining parts there.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 08 Jul 2018 22:52:33 +0530] rev 3877
amend: allow aborting an `amend --patch` by saving an empty file (issue5925)
This patch fixes issue5925 by allow aborting a `hg amend --patch` call by saving
an empty patch file. This is similar to aborting of `hg amend` when commit
message is empty.
Test changes demonstrate the fix.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 08 Jul 2018 22:50:16 +0530] rev 3876
tests: add a test to demonstrate issue5925
The issue will be fixed in next patch.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 09 Jul 2018 01:18:40 +0200] rev 3875
test: fix possible output change from 4.7
Change in debug timing can display these extra messages.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 06 Jul 2018 11:36:24 -0700] rev 3874
state: add the get() method that evolvecmd:1836 expects
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:56:54 +0200] rev 3873
rewing: prevent rewind in case of uncommitted changes
rewind can update, which means merge and troubles. We might relax this
limitation in the future.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:46:46 +0200] rev 3872
rewind: default to rewinding the current stack
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:10:19 +0200] rev 3871
rewing: add the ability to rewind "from" revisions
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:29:34 +0200] rev 3870
evolve: exclude "identical" precursors from the precursors set
I'm not sure it is the right thing to do, but it simply thing a lot for now.
Otherwise, using 'precursors' to find rewind direction become too complex.
This is going to give problematic result in case of prune. Since there are no
other precursors to follow.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:07:53 +0200] rev 3869
rewind: move revision selection into its own function
This will help making the logic more advanced.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 02:32:29 +0200] rev 3868
rewind: automatically rewind entire stack
We now rewind the full stack, avoiding creating orphans. A `--exact` flag is
added to force rewinding only the explicitly specified changesets.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 02:22:28 +0200] rev 3867
rewind: add a test about rewinding top of stack
For now this rewind is creating an orphan. We add the test to check the behavior
in that case.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 02:03:03 +0200] rev 3866
rewind: use rewinded parent when creating multiple changesets
Use use the rewinded parent instead of creating orphans based on identical, but
obsolete, changesets.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:22:31 +0200] rev 3865
rewind: add a test for rewinding a fold
The code already have basic support for case. However the result create orphan
that will need to be improved. However, we keep this changeset simple.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 01:36:30 +0200] rev 3864
rewind: add a test for rewinding a split
There are no code change needed but it is worth testing on its own.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:33:43 +0200] rev 3863
rewind: update the working copy if it gets obsoleted
If the working copy parent is rewinded, follow the rewind.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 01:04:20 +0200] rev 3862
rewind: add a message about obsolete changeset
Not the best output, but useful to have the data. We can improve that later.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:15:18 +0200] rev 3861
rewind: obsolete latest successors unless instructed otherwise
To prevent the creations of divergence, we automatically mark the successors set
of the rewinded changeset as obsoleted by the rewind result. A new flag
`--as-divergence` is added to disable this behavior.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:32:22 +0200] rev 3860
rewind: test rewinding an amended changesets
We are now able to rewind a simple amended changeset. For now, its current
successors has not been obsoleted and we created divergence.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:57:09 +0200] rev 3859
rewind: add a message about the rewinded changesets
This helps to understand what happened.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:11:52 +0200] rev 3858
rewind: add a proto version of the command
This first version focus on rewinding a single revision without care for the
consequence.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:51:56 +0200] rev 3857
stablesort: make sure heads are processed in sorted order
changeset 72621094505f will fix some ordering issue in the `heads` revset so we
stabilise the output in advance.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:21:54 +0530] rev 3856
evolve: move the bookmarks also when updating to successor (issue5923)
When we are on an obsolete node and does `hg evolve`, it updates to it's
sucessor, however it does not move the bookmark to the successor.
This patch adds logic to make sure we move the bookmark too.
Test change demonstrates the fix.