Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:52:14 +0530] rev 3915
CHANGELOG: add some entries and remove duplicated entries
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:52:06 +0200] rev 3914
branching: merge default into stable
The stable branch of Mercurial core now contains Mercurial 4.7 so evolve branch
policy requires this merge. The @ bookmark is in the right location, so people
doing clone will get to the latest release.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:07:39 +0200] rev 3913
branching: merge with the other head
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:48:15 +0200] rev 3912
test-compat: backed out changeset 8fe8152ff071
These output change were for 4.7 only.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:47:20 +0200] rev 3911
test-compat: backed out changeset 41fc764bf28c
These output change are for mercurial-4.7 only
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:46:30 +0200] rev 3910
test-compat: backed out changeset dda5b2134b32
These change were for Mercurial 4.7 only.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:45:01 +0200] rev 3909
test-compat: backout change to 1e103c7f7663
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:25:57 +0200] rev 3908
compat: use older API for older version
This API changed in 4.7, we need to adjust.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:28:19 +0200] rev 3907
branching: create mercurial-4.6 branch for updated test output
This branch will be used to check for 4.6 compatibility.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 16:12:01 -0700] rev 3906
builddependencies: extract function for getting successors
The code no longer makes a difference between single- and
mult-successor cases and just needs a set (or generator, really) of
successors to iterate over. Let's extract that into a function.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 16:23:25 -0700] rev 3905
builddependencies: share code between single- and multi-successor cases
The two cases now have more similar structure ("if succ in revs:
dependencies[r].add(succ)"), so let's share the code so it doesn't
start drifting apart again.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:33:48 -0700] rev 3904
builddependencies: build inverse dict from forward dict
It's error-prone to keep "dependencies" and "rdependencies" in sync
(we don't do it correctly when there are multiple successors or a
node). It's easier to just create "rependencies" from "dependencies"
after it's complete.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:21:49 -0700] rev 3903
builddependencies: remove a use of defaultdict
I don't see much reason to make "rdependencies" be a defaultdict when
"dependencies" is not. It's easy to initialize each entry ourselves.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:03:35 +0200] rev 3902
branching: merge with stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:30:37 -0700] rev 3901
builddependencies: don't remove found deps when divergence found (issue5946)
It seems obviously wrong to not keep any dependencies for a revision
that we had already found (for p1) if we run into divergence (from
p2). It also happens to fix issue5946 :)
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:47:16 -0700] rev 3900
builddependencies: don't add dependency on revision outside input set
This was already handled in the single-successor case, but had been
missed in the multiple-successors case.
Note that there seems to be a copy of builddependencies() in the
topics extension. I don't use topics more than I have to, so I'll let
someone else fix that code.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:16:25 -0700] rev 3899
builddependencies: consider all divergent successors
We were only considering one. In test-evolve-abort-conentdiv.t:165,
the input revs were {5, 8} and dependency dict was {8: set([]), 5:
set([10])}, which is a little weird (10 is not in the input set). It
still worked because the callers used it (they seemed to only care if
there were *any* dependencies).
This patch fixes the issue by considering all successors. That means
the dependency dict will be {8: set([]), 5: set([8, 10])} after this
patch. The next patch will remove the 10 from that set.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:00:49 -0700] rev 3898
tests: add test for issue5946
The test case is a copy of the one for 5833. The only difference is
that the merge parents are recorded in the opposite order (and that
the test is truncated because it fails).
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 25 May 2018 17:17:56 +0200] rev 3897
obslog: check filtered output with folded changesets
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 25 May 2018 16:50:04 +0200] rev 3896
obslog: check filtered output with splitted changesets
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 25 May 2018 11:52:48 +0200] rev 3895
obslog: check filtered output with pruned changesets
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 16:48:35 +0200] rev 3894
obslog: check filtered output with amended changesets
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 25 May 2018 11:48:19 +0200] rev 3893
tests: add a content-divergent obshistory test
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:44:05 +0200] rev 3892
tests: extract the obshistory amend then fold test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:42:56 +0200] rev 3891
tests: extract the content-divergence test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:41:57 +0200] rev 3890
tests: extract the obshistory fold test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:40:56 +0200] rev 3889
tests: extract the obshistory lots of split test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:37:51 +0200] rev 3888
tests: extract the obshistory split test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:37:40 +0200] rev 3887
tests: extract the obshistory prune test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 15:40:29 +0200] rev 3886
tests: extract the obshistory amend test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 15:35:54 +0200] rev 3885
tests: extract obshistory setup in a separate file
We are gonna soon explode the obshistory test file into several, extract the
setup to reuse it as much as possible.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 12:07:24 +0200] rev 3884
obslog: add a new flag to filter out non-local nodes
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:28:44 +0200] rev 3883
compat: drop compatibility hack for mercurial <4.3
We no longer support version prior 4.3.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sat, 21 Jul 2018 02:42:29 +0530] rev 3882
compat: temporarily move copies fix to compat.py
This patch moves a fixed version of copies._fullcopytracing() to compat.py as
this was not fixed in core before release and also we need to do this anyway for
the older versions of mercurial.
This fix is that when base changeset is not ancestor of any of the merging
commits, we don't throw an error.
The phabricator differential which will fix this in core is
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3896.
This fixes the traceback we get in previous changeset while relocating one of
the content-divergent changeset.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Jun 2018 18:18:30 +0530] rev 3881
evolve: continue conflicted relocation content-divergence
This patch adds logic to continue an conflicted content-divergence resolution
which was interrupted while relocating one of the divergent commits.
The tests shows the there is some mishandling of copies internally which will be
fixed in next patch.
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 18 Jul 2018 18:17:16 +0800] rev 3880
topic: use self instead of repo in topicrepo methods
Referring to repo here was somehow preventing it from being garbage-collected
(important in hgweb, where currently every request gets a new repo).
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 08 Jul 2018 22:16:17 +0530] rev 3879
evolvecmd: introduce fn to be wrapped by extensions resolving content-div
The function added will be used by extension by wrapping it and adding logic to
merge data introduced by them. For example: topic extension can wrap this
function and add logic to merge topic names.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 08 Jul 2018 21:18:33 +0530] rev 3878
evolvecmd: move remaining logic to merge commit desc to existing utility fn
This was a bit awful because we had a utility function and still we did some of
merging outside of that fn. So let's move the remaining parts there.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 08 Jul 2018 22:52:33 +0530] rev 3877
amend: allow aborting an `amend --patch` by saving an empty file (issue5925)
This patch fixes issue5925 by allow aborting a `hg amend --patch` call by saving
an empty patch file. This is similar to aborting of `hg amend` when commit
message is empty.
Test changes demonstrate the fix.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 08 Jul 2018 22:50:16 +0530] rev 3876
tests: add a test to demonstrate issue5925
The issue will be fixed in next patch.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 09 Jul 2018 01:18:40 +0200] rev 3875
test: fix possible output change from 4.7
Change in debug timing can display these extra messages.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 06 Jul 2018 11:36:24 -0700] rev 3874
state: add the get() method that evolvecmd:1836 expects
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:56:54 +0200] rev 3873
rewing: prevent rewind in case of uncommitted changes
rewind can update, which means merge and troubles. We might relax this
limitation in the future.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:46:46 +0200] rev 3872
rewind: default to rewinding the current stack
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:10:19 +0200] rev 3871
rewing: add the ability to rewind "from" revisions
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:29:34 +0200] rev 3870
evolve: exclude "identical" precursors from the precursors set
I'm not sure it is the right thing to do, but it simply thing a lot for now.
Otherwise, using 'precursors' to find rewind direction become too complex.
This is going to give problematic result in case of prune. Since there are no
other precursors to follow.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:07:53 +0200] rev 3869
rewind: move revision selection into its own function
This will help making the logic more advanced.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 02:32:29 +0200] rev 3868
rewind: automatically rewind entire stack
We now rewind the full stack, avoiding creating orphans. A `--exact` flag is
added to force rewinding only the explicitly specified changesets.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 02:22:28 +0200] rev 3867
rewind: add a test about rewinding top of stack
For now this rewind is creating an orphan. We add the test to check the behavior
in that case.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 02:03:03 +0200] rev 3866
rewind: use rewinded parent when creating multiple changesets
Use use the rewinded parent instead of creating orphans based on identical, but
obsolete, changesets.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:22:31 +0200] rev 3865
rewind: add a test for rewinding a fold
The code already have basic support for case. However the result create orphan
that will need to be improved. However, we keep this changeset simple.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 01:36:30 +0200] rev 3864
rewind: add a test for rewinding a split
There are no code change needed but it is worth testing on its own.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:33:43 +0200] rev 3863
rewind: update the working copy if it gets obsoleted
If the working copy parent is rewinded, follow the rewind.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 01:04:20 +0200] rev 3862
rewind: add a message about obsolete changeset
Not the best output, but useful to have the data. We can improve that later.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:15:18 +0200] rev 3861
rewind: obsolete latest successors unless instructed otherwise
To prevent the creations of divergence, we automatically mark the successors set
of the rewinded changeset as obsoleted by the rewind result. A new flag
`--as-divergence` is added to disable this behavior.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:32:22 +0200] rev 3860
rewind: test rewinding an amended changesets
We are now able to rewind a simple amended changeset. For now, its current
successors has not been obsoleted and we created divergence.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:57:09 +0200] rev 3859
rewind: add a message about the rewinded changesets
This helps to understand what happened.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:11:52 +0200] rev 3858
rewind: add a proto version of the command
This first version focus on rewinding a single revision without care for the
consequence.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:51:56 +0200] rev 3857
stablesort: make sure heads are processed in sorted order
changeset 72621094505f will fix some ordering issue in the `heads` revset so we
stabilise the output in advance.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:21:54 +0530] rev 3856
evolve: move the bookmarks also when updating to successor (issue5923)
When we are on an obsolete node and does `hg evolve`, it updates to it's
sucessor, however it does not move the bookmark to the successor.
This patch adds logic to make sure we move the bookmark too.
Test change demonstrates the fix.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:21:44 +0530] rev 3855
tests: add test to demonstrate issue5923
This will be fixed in upcoming patch.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 28 Jun 2018 17:26:16 +0200] rev 3854
changelog: add an entry about the new `evolve.interrupted` section
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:50:17 +0530] rev 3853
evolve: make one missed error to align other error messages
Previous patches missed this error to change it to the new format. Let's align
this with all other messages raised by `hg evolve` command.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:16:29 +0530] rev 3852
evolve: raise error.InterventionRequired instead of Abort when conflicts
error.InterventionRequired is a better error to raise in such cases.
Thanks to marmoute for noticing this.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 14 Jun 2018 02:58:30 +0200] rev 3851
changelog: add a changelog entry about divergence resolution
We made a lots of progress there.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 14 Jun 2018 01:39:33 +0530] rev 3850
evolve: create resolved cset on successors of current parents
While resolving content-divergence, sometimes, the parent can be obsolete and
have a successor. We should consider the successors of the parents instead of
obsolete parents as that will do something like orphan+content-divergence
resolution both at the same time which is powerful and results in a single stack
while resolving content-divergence of stacks.
The test changes demonstrates that we can now successfully evolve a content
divergent stack.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 14 Jun 2018 01:39:11 +0530] rev 3849
tests: fix a test case to not create conflicts
This is the test case where we are testing about divergence resolution of stack
of patches. If the stack is as follows:
C1 C2
| |
B1 B2
| |
A1 A2
\/
base
And A1-A2, B1-B2 and C1-C2 are content-divergent, and merging A1-A2 results in
conflicts.
Now if you resolve conflicts and continue resoling B1-B2, the conflicts of A1-A2
will still be there. We need somehow to understand the work we has done and not
create conflicts again.
To test the evolution functionality for now, we make sure conflicts does not
occur.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 14 Jun 2018 01:06:12 +0530] rev 3848
evolve: introduce a resolutionparent variable and store it in evolvestate
This patch introduces a resolutionparent variable which will be the parent of
final changeset after resolving content-divergent changesets.
Till now, the parent is always the parent of one of the divergent node, but now
in upcoming cases, it can be a successor of both the parents of divergent nodes.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 13 Jun 2018 18:08:57 +0530] rev 3847
evolve: introduce a dirstatedance() fn to fix dirstate after parent change
This patch introduces a dirstatedance() function which will be used after fixing
the dirstate when we change parents using repo.dirstate.setparents().
Look at docs added for more details.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:15:10 +0530] rev 3846
evolve: create a new commit instead of amending one of the divergents
This patch changes the behavior of evolve command while resolving
content-divergence to create a new commit instead of amending one of the
divergent ones.
In past, I have made this change, backed out this change and now today again I
am doing this change, so let's dive in some history.
Using cmdrewrite.amend() was never a good option as that requires hack to delete
the evolvestate and also gives us less control over things. We can't make the
commit on top of different parents as that of content-divergent ones. Due to all
these, I first made this change to create a new commit instead of amending one.
But, after few days, there was flakiness observed in the tests and turned out
that we need to do some dirstate dance as repo.dirstate.setparents() does not
always fix the dirstate. That flakiness was a blocker for progress at that time
and we decided to switch to amend back so that we can have things working with
some hacks and we can later fix the implementation part.
Now, yesterday while tackling resolving content-divergence of a stack which is
as follows:
C1 C2
| |
B1 B2
| |
A1 A2
\/
base
where, A1-A2, B1-B2, C1-C2 are content-divergent with each other. Now we can
resolve A1-A2 very well because they have the same parent and let's say that
resolution leads to A3.
Now, we want to resolve B1-B2 and make the new resolution commit on top of A3 so
that we can end up something like:
C3
|
B3
|
A3
|
base
however, amending one of the divergent changesets, it's not possible to create a
commit on a different parent like A3 here without some relocation. We should
prevent relocation as that may leads to some conflicts and should change the
parent before committing.
So, looking ahead, we can't move with using amend as still using that we will
need some relocation hacks making code ugly and prone to bad behaviors, bugs.
Let's change back to creating a new commit so that we can move forward in a good
way.
About repo.dirstate.setparents() not setting the dirstate, I have researched
yesterday night about how we can do that and found out that we can use
cmdrewrite._uncommitdirstate() here. Expect upcoming patches to improve the
documentation of that function.
There are lot of test changes because of change in hash but there is no behavior
change. The only behavior change is in test-evolve-abort-contentdiv.t which is
nice because creating a new commit helps us in stripping that while aborting.
We have a lot of testing of content-divergence and no behavior change gives
enough confidence for making this change.
I reviewed the patch carefully to make sure there is no behavior change and I
suggest reviewer to do the same.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 12 Jun 2018 23:20:54 +0530] rev 3845
evolve: always order the revs to be evolved
The current code only order the revs if we are resolving orphans and not in
other case. The ordering is important when we pass --all and tackle multiple
occurence of the same instability.
Let's order the revs for each instability. There are enough test coverage of
phase-divergence and content-divergence that I feel confident doing it because
none of the test changed.
The change in test-evolve-content-divergent.t demonstrates the indeed ordering
helped.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 12 Jun 2018 21:13:02 +0530] rev 3844
tests: add test of resolution of content-divergent stacks
This patch adds a test of resolution of content-divergence stacks where a series
of changesets get mutated as two different series resulting in whole
content-divergent stacks.
As the tests shows, we are not processing the changesets in right order which
needs to be fixed first.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 12 Jun 2018 19:00:12 +0530] rev 3843
evolve: improve error messages when conflicts occur
This patch improves the error messages when conflicts occur.
First, we drop the line 'evolution failed', that is not the best line we can
show and evolution didn't failed, it's just interrupted by the conflicts and
when user will run `hg evolve --continue`, things will be fine. I still remember
when I first saw 'evolution failed', I got a bit scare as am I in a recoverable
position or not. So let's drop this scary line.
Second, we replace the error messages to say `resolve conflicts and see
help-topic`. The help topic was added recently and documents all the three flags
very well. Addition of tests also showed that all the three flags works fine
with all the three instability type. So we should advertise them more.
Third, we now raise the error with our error message rather than raising
MergeFailure and having evolution related text in hint or stderr above. This
increase the focus on the error message we want to show.
After this patch, I think error messages by evolve in case of conflicts will be
same in every case.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 12 Jun 2018 04:01:19 +0530] rev 3842
evolve: point to `hg help evolve.interrupted` while resolving content-div
Recent test additions shows that --abort and --stop works well while resolving
content-divergence and we should advertise them. This patch does so by pointing
to evolve.interrupted help topic.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 12 Jun 2018 03:29:13 +0530] rev 3841
tests: add test about aborting content-divergence when multiple parents
This patch adds tests for --abort flag of hg evolve command when we are
resolving content-divergence which are on different parents and parent of one of
them is the gca of both of them.
The tests shows that we are doing good and we should advertise the flag during
conflicts.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:47:19 +0530] rev 3840
CHANGELOG: add an entry about the --update flag
Since --update is still the default, we make the entry about --no-update.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 06 Jun 2018 04:29:05 +0530] rev 3839
evolve: show unfinished information in `hg status -v` (issue5886)
`hg status -v` shows information about unfinished states or `hg status` shows it
when `commands.status.verbose=True` is set.
Before this patch, information about interrupted evolve does not show up because
evolve does not resgiters in cmdutil.STATES. This patch make sure we register
evolve related information there.
There has been an idea to unify cmdutil.unfinishedstates and cmdutil.STATES
which needs some work and the resulting state does looks a bit complicated. So
till the time we unify them, let's fix this bug by registering in
cmdutil.STATES.
Denis Laxalde <denis.laxalde@logilab.fr> [Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:58:14 +0200] rev 3838
style: drop a (commented) debug print
Left-over from 4dcf87849f9d.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 10 Jun 2018 20:58:55 +0530] rev 3837
tests: update tests output with changes in d0abd7949ea3 in core hg
CORE-TEST-OUTPUT-UPDATE: d0abd7949ea3
CORE-TEST-OUTPUT-UPDATE: 1e9c357d3ddf
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:40:57 +0200] rev 3836
branching: merge with stable
Merging with the new 8.0.1 release.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 11 Jun 2018 23:31:44 +0530] rev 3835
Added tag 8.0.1 for changeset 0887c30255a1
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 11 Jun 2018 23:30:24 +0530] rev 3834
packaging: prepare for 8.0.1 release
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 11 Jun 2018 20:24:45 +0200] rev 3833
changelog: add a couple of missing entry
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 11 Jun 2018 20:17:56 +0530] rev 3832
evolve: strip the extra obsmarkers if any on `hg evolve --abort`
Previous patches started storing some obsmarkers which needs to stripped during
`evolve --abort` which can't be stripped by stripping the new evolved changesets
because they point to a node which existed before the evolution was performed.
This patch adds logic to strip those obsmarkers by finding their indices in the
obsstore and then stripping them.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 11 Jun 2018 20:13:36 +0530] rev 3831
evolve: store the obsmarkers to be deleted in evolvestate
Sometimes, we don't create a new node and obsolete one of the old node in favour
of an existing node. When user calls, `hg evolve --abort`, we need to strip that
obsmarker to go back in the same old state. The obsmarker created for new node
are stripped when the new nodes are stripped.
This patch start storing such obsmarkers in the evolvestate so that we can delete
them later if required. Right now we just store successsor and predecessor
information, we might need a better obsmarker serialization techinque in future
to make it more robust.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 11 Jun 2018 15:52:11 +0530] rev 3830
evolve: store obsmarkers to be deleted in evolvestate
There are operations which don't create a new node rather they just obsolete one
of the unstable node in favour of existing one. In such cases if a further
resolution leads to conflicts and user calls `evolve --abort` or `evolve
--stop`, we might need to delete that obsmarker. So let's store such obsmarkers
in the evolvestate.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 11 Jun 2018 15:38:43 +0530] rev 3829
evolve: factor out logic to merge branches in separate function
This patch moves the logic to merge branches while resolving content-divergence
to a separate function.
This makes code clear and better to understand.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 11 Jun 2018 01:00:57 +0530] rev 3828
tests: add more test of --stop while resolving content-divergence
This tests the --stop flag when conflicts occur while relocating one of the
divergent changesets.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:47:28 +0530] rev 3827
evolve: strip the relocation commit on `hg evolve --stop`
While resolving content-divergence on multiple parents, we relocate one of the
commit on the parent of another one and then merge the divergent changesets.
Merging can leads to conflicts, and if user does `hg evolve --stop`, we need to
strip that relocated changeset too! This patch does that.
Test changes demonstrates the fix.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:43:39 +0530] rev 3826
evolve: declare updated and pctx variables in stopevolve()
They will used in next patch.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 10 Jun 2018 22:52:11 +0530] rev 3825
evolve: store the old other divergent node after relocation in evolvestate
When the content-divergent changes are on different parents and we relocate of
the node to the parent of another one, we get a new other-divergent node. We
still need to store the older other-divergent in evolvestate so that we can use
that information.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 10 Jun 2018 22:42:57 +0530] rev 3824
evolve: factor out logic for --stop flag in separate function
This will make code clean
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 10 Jun 2018 22:38:08 +0530] rev 3823
tests: add test for --stop flag when resolving multiparents content-div
This patch adds a test for --stop flag when we are in an interrupted
content-divergent resolution which have multiple parents. Conflicts happen we
merge the divergent changesets after relocation. The test shows that we
need to strip the relocated changeset.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 10 Jun 2018 20:35:48 +0530] rev 3822
evolve: move logic to continue interrupted content-div resolution to new fn
Each of the other type has defined their own function to continue/complete the
interrupted resolution. We take out the logic for content-div resolution too in
a separate function to make the top level function looks clean.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 11 Jun 2018 01:12:12 +0530] rev 3821
evolve: rename help topic evolve.interrupted-evolve to evolve.interrupted
`evolve.interrupted-evolve` has the word evolve twice. Now that this help topic
is a part of evolve command, evolve.interrupted will mean the interrupted evolve
command only.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sat, 09 Jun 2018 00:15:27 +0530] rev 3820
packaging: update tested-with statements in evolve and topic
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sat, 09 Jun 2018 00:12:08 +0530] rev 3819
CHANGELOG: mention about 4.6.1 compatibility
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 08 Jun 2018 22:52:53 +0530] rev 3818
test-compat: merge mercurial-4.4 into mercurial-4.3
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 08 Jun 2018 22:52:52 +0530] rev 3817
test-compat: merge mercurial-4.5 into mercurial-4.4
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 08 Jun 2018 22:52:51 +0530] rev 3816
test-compat: merge stable into mercurial-4.5
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 22 May 2018 23:51:57 +0530] rev 3815
utility: use ui.interactive() instead of checking config value
Before this patch, the rev selection prompt which pops up in case of ambiguity
to ask user to select a rev used to check the config value of ui.interactive
which can is by default set to None.
We should use ui.interactive() instead which is more smart in such cases.
Thanks to martinvonz for suggesting this.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 08 Jun 2018 19:48:53 +0530] rev 3814
CHANGELOG: add couple of entries about things fixed
We are preparing for a release!
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 08 Jun 2018 17:36:28 +0530] rev 3813
next-prev: always respect the --merge flag
An earlier bug fix series which started respecting commands.update.check
introduced a bug in which --merge was not respected sometimes. This patch fixes
that behavior by passing updatecheck as 'none' to hg.updatetotally() if --merge
is passed which is similar to what `hg update` does.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 08 Jun 2018 18:32:48 +0530] rev 3812
next-prev: add tests showing --merge not respected in some cases
This patch adds tests which show that --merge is not respected when you set
commands.update.check to any value.
This is a bug I wrote few days ago and will fix it in next changeset.
I like this process of writing bugs and fixing them.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Jun 2018 22:59:39 +0530] rev 3811
evolve: store the evolvestate if relocation results in conflicts
We missed storing the evolvestate on disk when relocation lead to conflicts. We
need to store it to grab information to continue or abort or stop the evolve.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Jun 2018 22:45:54 +0530] rev 3810
tests: add more test of resolution of content-divergent changesets
This patch adds test of resolution of content-divergent changesets when
relocation is required and it leads to conflicts. The test shows that we are not
doing the right thing. This will be fixed in upcoming patches.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Jun 2018 18:18:10 +0530] rev 3809
evolvestate: store info about relocation while resolving content-divergence
While resolving content-divergence when they are on different parents, we
relocate one of the node to parent of another one and this can lead to conflicts
sometimes. So we need to store information about that state in evolvestate so
that we can use that when user does `hg evolve --continue` or `--stop` or
`--abort`.
Now that we make sure, we store the new other node in evolvestate, we fix the
behavior of handling the relocated commit and merge the right changesets.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Jun 2018 18:13:54 +0530] rev 3808
evolve: factor out logic to merge content divergent csets in separate fn
This will help us in reusing the logic if we need to while doing evolve
--continue.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Jun 2018 20:27:03 +0530] rev 3807
evolve: commit the transaction if conflicts occur while merging content-div
Yes, let's commit the transaction in case conflicts occur. Yes, this is what
unshelve does and this is one of the reasons we don't like unshelve.
Previous patches added support for resolving content-divergence when they are on
different parents with parent of one being the gca. In such cases, we relocate
one of the divergent commit to the parent of another one.
All the relocation stuff and merging divergent changeset stuff happens in a
single transaction, so if there are conflicts while merging, we abort and the
transaction rollsback and our relocated commit is not applied after abort.
We don't want to process the relocation because that can lead to conflicts and
we will have dirty wdir because of resolving conflicts.
So, we commit the transaction when merging results in conflicts to make sure if
relocation happened, we commit that.
This fixes the absence of relocation commit found in previous patch and uncover
a new bug about handling of relocated commit. Upcoming patch will fix it.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Jun 2018 15:54:32 +0530] rev 3806
tests: add tests for resolving content-divergence when different parents
This patch adds more tests for cases when we try to resolve content-divergence
when they are on different parents.
The last test shows the we are somehow missing the relocated commit in
interrupted transaction. This will be fixed in next patch.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 01 Jun 2018 19:52:06 +0530] rev 3805
evolve: implement resolution of content-divergence when on differet parents
This patch implements the basic version of resolution of content-divergence
changesets when they are on different parents but one of the parent is gca of
both the different parents.
The functionality first relocates the divergent changeset which was left behind
and then resolves the content-divergence like it resolves in normal cases.
This is a very basic implementation because it still does not work on
interrupted evolution. Test changes in this patch shows the basic functionality
working. The output of dry-run is also required to be tweaked in such cased.
Upcoming patches will add more tests and will improve the implementation to work
during conflicts too.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 01 Jun 2018 19:57:19 +0530] rev 3804
tests: add tests for resolving content-divergence with parent change
This patch adds a new test file test-evolve-content-divergence.t which tests the
resolution of content divergence when the divergent changesets does not have the
same parents.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 06 Jun 2018 03:49:17 +0530] rev 3803
CHANGELOG: add an entry about fixing issue5877
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 06 Jun 2018 03:26:47 +0530] rev 3802
evolve: pop up editor if conflicts occur while merging commit messages
Last patch added support for merging commit messages while resolving content
divergence. In case of conflicts we fallback to one of the divergent commit
messages.
After this patch, we will pop up an editor where user has to resolve the
conflicts in the commit messages and then continue.
Tests are added for this. We need to fix handling in test-sharing.t to use
HGEDITOR to fix conflicts and pass the new commit message.
Future improvement can be that we should respect HGMERGE while merging commit
descriptions too.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 04 Jun 2018 01:28:02 +0530] rev 3801
evolve: merge commit messages while resolving content-divergence (issue5877)
While resolving content-divergence, there can be divergence in commit messages
too which should be resolved.
This patch uses the hg's internal merge API's to merge commit messages of
divergent changesets with predecessor as the base.
In case of conflicts, we fallback to divergent's commit message which should be
changed in future. We should pop up the editor with the commit message and the
conflict markers and let user fix that.
Tests are added for the functionality added.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 06 Jun 2018 01:19:36 +0530] rev 3800
evolve: move if-else block under the right block
the index related if-else should be only executed when all three base, divergent
and other have different branch names.
I coded this last night and mistakenly mis-indented it. Caught when I was adding
more tests.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 05 Jun 2018 22:02:24 +0530] rev 3799
tests: make sure we don't result in commit messages conflict
Upcoming patches will introduce functionality of merging commit messages while
resolving content divergence which can lead to conflicts.
We don't want to test the conflicts scenario here, so let's make sure there are
no conflicts of commit messages in this test.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 05 Jun 2018 21:02:09 +0530] rev 3798
tests: don't use mkcommit shell function in test-divergent.t
Upcoming series will start merging commit descriptions while resolving
content-divergence. This tests are here to test the basics of content-divegrence
resolution and we should not be testing much of commit description merge here.
Replacing mkcommit function with normal hg calls will help us decide on the
commit messages ourselves and prevent conflicts while merging commit messages.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 06 Jun 2018 14:35:36 +0200] rev 3797
evolve: remove duplicated documentation
File saving failureā¦
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 06 Jun 2018 04:09:49 +0530] rev 3796
evolve: show `hg help evolve.interrupted-evolve` in error when conflicts
The help list various flags which you can use during interrupted evolve
resolution and description about what they do. This will be very helpful for
user on how to continue an interrupted evolve.