Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:33:02 +0800 obshistory: omit keyword arguments with default values in patch.diffui() calls stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:33:02 +0800] rev 4399
obshistory: omit keyword arguments with default values in patch.diffui() calls d4c9eebdd72d made that function not take "relroot" and "prefix" anymore, and instead expect "pathfn". These two chunks of code in this patch simply generate patches for obslog -p and they broke because they tried to provide default values for "prefix" and "relroot" for no apparent reason (and also for "changes"). Let's instead rely on defaults of patch.diffui().
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 17:52:49 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 17:52:49 +0100] rev 4398
branching: merge with stable
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:21:09 +0100 test: wider another time matching in prev/next lock testing stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:21:09 +0100] rev 4397
test: wider another time matching in prev/next lock testing There does not seems to be a reasons for specifically matching 4-6 seconds. Wider matching will avoid intermittent failure.
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:29:54 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:29:54 +0100] rev 4396
branching: merge with stable
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:26:48 +0100 test: wider time matching in prev/next lock testing stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:26:48 +0100] rev 4395
test: wider time matching in prev/next lock testing There does not seems to be a reasons for specifically matching 4-6 seconds. Wider matching will avoid intermittent failure.
Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:00:46 +0000 topic: make topics compatible with branchmap refactor
Martijn Pieters <mj@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:00:46 +0000] rev 4394
topic: make topics compatible with branchmap refactor See https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5290
Wed, 30 Jan 2019 10:03:00 -0800 prompts: use 1-indexing in revselectionprompt()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 30 Jan 2019 10:03:00 -0800] rev 4393
prompts: use 1-indexing in revselectionprompt() The consumer is generally a human, not a computer. I've made the mistake of entering "1" instead of "0" a few times myself.
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 tip