Mon, 25 Nov 2019 19:12:51 +0530 evolve: use more specific key name to store in evolvestate
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Mon, 25 Nov 2019 19:12:51 +0530] rev 5014
evolve: use more specific key name to store in evolvestate Now, as we also relocate divergent cset if required, so let's use more specific key to track the relocation of "divergent" and "other".
Fri, 13 Dec 2019 01:29:27 +0530 evolve: move a test where it makes more sense
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Fri, 13 Dec 2019 01:29:27 +0530] rev 5013
evolve: move a test where it makes more sense
Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:22:18 +0530 evolve: remove the unnecessary condition to check empty successors set
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:22:18 +0530] rev 5012
evolve: remove the unnecessary condition to check empty successors set I annotated the history of this "newer == [()]" condition and found that it was added in the initial stages of evolution project (more than 8 years ago) and there is no test where we get [()] as a successor set. So looks like "if not newer" is enough to check if it is empty. I also looked into obsutil.successorssets() implementation and I don't think it would give us [()] in any case.
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -3 +3 +10 +30 +100 +300 tip