simple4server: fix a missing import

evolve: update version compatibility error message

exchange: fix pull over wire protocol Actually hand pulled obsolescence markers to the pull logic. In the wire protocol case we did not reset the position of the file pointer after writing the pulled data. This lead the pull logic to thing that no markers were send at all. This changeset fix this client side bug. (apparently no test check both markers pulling and wireprotocol)

exchange: enforce permission on new wireprotocol command hgweb needs an explicit declaration of the permission level of each commands.

merge stable

evolve: fix typos in uncommit docstring

simple4server: add the wireproto command for obsolescence markers discovery This come with its usual train of duplicated utility.

discovery: use the discovery process for pull Wow! Such speed! Much functional! Very proof on concept implementation!

discovery: implement a discovery process and use it for push Much faster! So functional! Very proof on concept implementation! Wow!

discovery: first version of the "hash tree" idea We build a hash for each node based on the markers that applies to it and the hash of its parent. This will allow a kind of discovery process for markers.

evolve: update changelog with recent advance

merged 3.3 release into default Some of the default content was released in 3.3.0 the other ones are moved to 3.4

Added tag 3.3.0 for changeset 83882f2fbecb

prepare 3.3.0 release

evolve: drop `latercomer` and `conflicting` compatibility. Those old alias are deprecated for a long time now. All computations related to troubles are in Mercurial core for multiple versions.

evolve: use flag value from core for bumped fix This flag is available from core for a long time, lets use it directly from there. This commit intend to cleanup old stuff from the evolve extention.

test: get rid of all reference to conflicting changesets They are now called divergent for a long time.

merge various improvement to stable We want a good stable state before starting massive changes in default for obsolescence marker update.

exchange: add progress bar when pushing using wire protocol command Progress bar on pull was only available for pushkey based push before this changeset. This implementation is very hacky but we are still at a proof of concept stage for those new exchange method.

exchange: add progress bar when pulling using wire protocol command progress bar on pull was only available for pushkey based pull before this changeset.

exchange: fix pulling from simple for server There is far too much code duplication down there.

exchange: add test case for D.4

exchange: add test case for D.3

exchange: add test case for D.2

exchange: add test case for D.1

exchange: add test case for C.4

exchange: add test case for C.3

exchange: add test case for C.2

exchange: add test case for C.1

exchange: add test case for B.7

exchange: add test case for B.6

exchange: add test case for B.5

exchange: add test case for B.4

exchange: add test case for B.3

exchange: add test case for B.2

exchange: add test case for B.1

exchange: add test case for A.7

exchange: add test case for A.6

exchange: add test case for A.5

exchange: add test case for A.4

exchange: add test case for A.3 Allow arbitrary arguments to dotest. This allow to push --force when the push creates more heads.

exchange: automate the testing process too we now have: dotest TESTNAME [TARGETNODE]

exchange: have a function doing all the common initial setup This will help creation of further test.

exchance: add a common setup script for all test

exchange: add test case for A.2 Testcase defined here: http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/ObsolescenceMarkersExchange

exchange: add test case for A.1 Testcase defined here: http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/ObsolescenceMarkersExchange

exchange: add the pullmarker wireproto command to simple4server This will allow simple server side support. (yes, code duplication is bad I already told you I won't do it too much mom)

exchange: extract computation of pulled markers boundary in a function I expect massive experimentation on this specific aspect. so we better isolate it.