next-prev: always respect the --merge flag An earlier bug fix series which started respecting commands.update.check introduced a bug in which --merge was not respected sometimes. This patch fixes that behavior by passing updatecheck as 'none' to hg.updatetotally() if --merge is passed which is similar to what `hg update` does.

next-prev: add tests showing --merge not respected in some cases This patch adds tests which show that --merge is not respected when you set commands.update.check to any value. This is a bug I wrote few days ago and will fix it in next changeset. I like this process of writing bugs and fixing them.

evolve: store the evolvestate if relocation results in conflicts We missed storing the evolvestate on disk when relocation lead to conflicts. We need to store it to grab information to continue or abort or stop the evolve.

tests: add more test of resolution of content-divergent changesets This patch adds test of resolution of content-divergent changesets when relocation is required and it leads to conflicts. The test shows that we are not doing the right thing. This will be fixed in upcoming patches.

evolvestate: store info about relocation while resolving content-divergence While resolving content-divergence when they are on different parents, we relocate one of the node to parent of another one and this can lead to conflicts sometimes. So we need to store information about that state in evolvestate so that we can use that when user does `hg evolve --continue` or `--stop` or `--abort`. Now that we make sure, we store the new other node in evolvestate, we fix the behavior of handling the relocated commit and merge the right changesets.

evolve: factor out logic to merge content divergent csets in separate fn This will help us in reusing the logic if we need to while doing evolve --continue.

evolve: commit the transaction if conflicts occur while merging content-div Yes, let's commit the transaction in case conflicts occur. Yes, this is what unshelve does and this is one of the reasons we don't like unshelve. Previous patches added support for resolving content-divergence when they are on different parents with parent of one being the gca. In such cases, we relocate one of the divergent commit to the parent of another one. All the relocation stuff and merging divergent changeset stuff happens in a single transaction, so if there are conflicts while merging, we abort and the transaction rollsback and our relocated commit is not applied after abort. We don't want to process the relocation because that can lead to conflicts and we will have dirty wdir because of resolving conflicts. So, we commit the transaction when merging results in conflicts to make sure if relocation happened, we commit that. This fixes the absence of relocation commit found in previous patch and uncover a new bug about handling of relocated commit. Upcoming patch will fix it.