Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:41:51 -0700] rev 3570
topics: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:51:43 -0700] rev 3569
grab: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:51:34 -0700] rev 3568
touch: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:51:26 -0700] rev 3567
split: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:51:17 -0700] rev 3566
prune: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:51:07 -0700] rev 3565
metaedit: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:50:59 -0700] rev 3564
fold: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:50:45 -0700] rev 3563
uncommit: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:40:28 -0700] rev 3562
evolve: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:50:25 -0700] rev 3561
amend: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
This is for the legacy handling support for "hg commit --amend"
case. I picked "amend" because it feels more natural than
"commit". Besides, and more importantly, that's consistent what core
uses.