Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Mon, 04 Mar 2019 02:55:38 +0530] rev 4419
evolve: add test which shows unrecoverable evolve state (issue6053)
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sat, 02 Mar 2019 02:34:29 +0530] rev 4418
evolve: add a test in pubdiv where only merging leads to conflict
Added a test in public divergence where both the cset are on the different
parent and no conflict in relocation but in merging.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 28 Feb 2019 03:12:39 +0530] rev 4417
evolve: cover continue case in pubdiv when merging results in same as public
This patch is the part of a series which is adding support of public
divergence resolution of the case when merging results in same as pubic
cset. Changes made in this patch cover the --continue flag for the case:
when we had conflicts in merging.
Modified lines in previously added tests reflects the changed behaviour.
Also added some additional tests. I guess I have covered every possbile
case in test-evolve-public-content-divergent.t
While reviewing, if you see any test missed please let me know.
(I think there is one test missed that I will send as a follow-up)
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:02:51 +0530] rev 4416
evolve: handle a case in pubic-div when merging results in same as public
In public divergence resolution, what we do is:
1) first apply content divergence resolution
2) then phase divergent resolution on resultant node of 1) case
While doing case 1 it is possible that result of merging the two csets
would have same changes as public one contains. And then processing
the case 2 would create an empty commit which is not something we want
to do.
So this patch catch that same case when merging results in same as public
cset and don't create a new node, instead to solve the divergence
it just add a obsmarker from "other divergent" to "public divergent"
i.e. [other, (public,)]
Next patch will add the continue case handling for this same case.
This patch also adds the tests for the different cases which are possible
for the above mentioned case.
There is test for continue case too which is broken in this patch
and will be fixed in next patch.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 28 Feb 2019 02:08:58 +0530] rev 4415
evolve: rename npublicdiv to publicnode
In next patches it would make more sense to use publicnode
instead of npublicdiv.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 28 Feb 2019 02:02:18 +0530] rev 4414
evolve: in pubdiv resolution make sure that transaction get closed
Before this patch it could be possible that transaction won't get
closed if res is False in the pubic divergence resolution when
continuing the hg evolve.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Mon, 25 Feb 2019 22:50:24 +0530] rev 4413
evolve: pin the public cset to local side in merging when solving public div
While working on public divergence, I think it would be better to pin
the public cset to local side of merge for understanding and handling
the future cases without any ambiguity.
Changes in tests reflect the changed behaviour.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sat, 23 Feb 2019 00:47:14 +0530] rev 4412
evolve: add tests of relocation case in public divergence
These tests cover the cases when "other" is behind the "public"
one and we would have to relocate "other" here. It covers
all the conflicting and non-conflicting cases.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 03 Mar 2019 16:29:32 +0100] rev 4411
branching: merge with stable
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sat, 02 Mar 2019 01:43:14 +0530] rev 4410
split: make sure hg split preserve the phase of splitting cset (issue6048)
Before this patch, while splitting we were not taking the phase
of splitting cset into account. By default new commits would
have draft changes. As we know there can two possible phases
i.e draft and secret in rewriting csets thing, so this adds
the handling of secret phase (as default is draft)
Changes in test file reflect the added behaviour.