Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:23:09 -0700 prune: prune fix transaction pattern
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:23:09 -0700] rev 1295
prune: prune fix transaction pattern I forgot to amend.
Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:26:03 -0700 prune: fix pruning w/ bookmarks and inhibit
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:26:03 -0700] rev 1294
prune: fix pruning w/ bookmarks and inhibit Previously prune would create the obsolesence markers, then try to fix up the bookmarks. With inhibit enabled, the act of closing a transaction for the bookmark step caused it to unhide commits that were trying to be pruned. The fix is to put the whole thing in a transaction.
Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:08:18 -0700 inhibit: remove book -D dependency on cmdprune
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:08:18 -0700] rev 1293
inhibit: remove book -D dependency on cmdprune Bookmark -D was relying on the prune command to be registered, which isn't the case if we've disabled evolve commands. Instead, let's just hard code the arguments. The real fix would be to abstract away the 'I want to prune commits' functionality in evolve to a reusable function, but this will do for now.
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -3 +3 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip