Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:55:43 +0100 revsfromrange: set the cache for the single bottom range in merge slicing
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:55:43 +0100] rev 2192
revsfromrange: set the cache for the single bottom range in merge slicing We no longer rely on the object magic here.
Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:55:23 +0100 revsfromrange: set the cache for the top range in merge slicing
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:55:23 +0100] rev 2191
revsfromrange: set the cache for the top range in merge slicing We no longer rely on the object magic here.
Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:44:29 +0100 revsfromrange: remove reference to '_revs' in merge slicing
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:44:29 +0100] rev 2190
revsfromrange: remove reference to '_revs' in merge slicing Given '_revs' is a property from the cache, we use the official method of the object we are on instead. That method should be using the same cache than the property if available.
Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:37:27 +0100 revsfromcache: update cache for the top slice if possible
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:37:27 +0100] rev 2189
revsfromcache: update cache for the top slice if possible Same logic, we update the cache if have the data.
Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:37:03 +0100 revsfromrange: skip setting the cache for length-1 top entry
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:37:03 +0100] rev 2188
revsfromrange: skip setting the cache for length-1 top entry The content of the range is trivial to compute.
Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:36:19 +0100 revsfromrange: update cache for parentrange directly in the code
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:36:19 +0100] rev 2187
revsfromrange: update cache for parentrange directly in the code We update it where it matters if we detect that we have the data.
Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:34:07 +0100 revsfromramge: hard code the single changeset range case
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:34:07 +0100] rev 2186
revsfromramge: hard code the single changeset range case That case is trivial and triggering and full stable sort for it seems a bit silly.
Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:18:01 +0100 stablerange: introduce caching for the full revision in a set
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:18:01 +0100] rev 2185
stablerange: introduce caching for the full revision in a set Such cache proved handy in the "per-range" class so we carry it along to the unified class. cf documentation for details.
Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:11:19 +0100 stablerange: add a cache for stablesort ordering
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:11:19 +0100] rev 2184
stablerange: add a cache for stablesort ordering This will be very handy for merge, cf inline documentation for details.
Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:05:21 +0100 stablerange: move revs computation within the main class
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:05:21 +0100] rev 2183
stablerange: move revs computation within the main class We still need to compute the revision withing a range when we slice a merge. This is the last large logic that remains in the individual class and we migrate is on the main class.
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip