evolve: move a test where it makes more sense

evolve: remove the unnecessary condition to check empty successors set I annotated the history of this "newer == [()]" condition and found that it was added in the initial stages of evolution project (more than 8 years ago) and there is no test where we get [()] as a successor set. So looks like "if not newer" is enough to check if it is empty. I also looked into obsutil.successorssets() implementation and I don't think it would give us [()] in any case.

evolve: delete redundant and incorrect code for updating dirstate In relocate() when we notice conflicts, we will try to fix up the dirstate by calling copies.duplicatecopies() and dirstatedance(). However, we had called _evolvemerge() just before that point and that has already fixed up the dirstate, so there's no need to do it again. Also, we did it incorrectly as the test case shows.

tests: demonstrate how evolve loses transitive copies when interrupted Let's say `b` has been renamed to `c` in commit A and then renamed to `d` in commit B. We now modify A in a way that will cause a conflict when we evolve B. `hg evolve` will now stop and let the user resolve the conflicts, but it will have lost the copy information in the working copy (should still be c->d).

evolve: use ui.configoverride() instead of ui.backupconfig() ui.configoverride() was added in hg 4.1. util.nullcontextmanager() was added in hg 4.4.

topic: use ui.configoverride() instead of ui.backupconfig() ui.configoverride() was added in hg 4.1. util.nullcontextmanager() was added in hg 4.4.

topic: use ui.configoverride() instead of ui.backupconfig() ui.configoverride() was added in hg 4.1. util.nullcontextmanager() was added in hg 4.4.

evolve: use ui.configoverride() instead of ui.backupconfig() ui.configoverride() was added in hg 4.1.

evolve: remove obsolete backup of allowemptycommit config We stopped setting the config in 88601e1cd5d8 (evolve: create new commit while resolving content-divergence, 2018-04-23), so there's no need to back it up.

evolve: remove dead initilization of "newnode" variable It's been dead since f9dad99a90d5 (evolve: create a new commit instead of amending one of the divergents, 2018-06-13).

evolve: fix a typo

changelog: mention the python 3 fix

changelog: mention the date fix for content divergence

branching: merge with stable

py3: fix several TypeError formatting bytes with an exception object

evolve: preserve date when resolving content-divergence (issue6202) This patch changes the implementation to do a 3 way merge. In case of actual conflict, it take the newest date from both sides of the content-divergence.

test: add test for content divergence involving a date update In this case, each side update the date.

test: add test for content divergence involving a date update In this case, one side update to an earlier date.

test: add test for content divergence involving a date update In this case, one side update to an older date.

test: highlight data handling when solving divergence The current handling of date is lacking, we add test to highlight this.

evolve: add tests for the case when resolution parent is ambiguous

evolve: abort if deciding resolution parent is ambiguous While solving content-divergence, it could be hard to decide which cset should be treated as a resolution parent if there are multiple successors of divergent cset. i.e split case. But we are planning to make some update in handling this split case: 1) consider highest one if all splitted csets are in a single topological branch 2) still need to decide if 1) doesn't apply

evolve: make sure divergence resolution doesn't undo changes (issue6203) Before this patch, in content-divergence resolution logic if resolution parent is not the parent of any of the two divergent changesets then it could undo some changes introduced by previous revs (while resolving stack of content-divergent changesets) as demonstrated by the test added in previous patch. To solve this, what this patch doing is: if divergent cset has obsolete parent with a successor then first resolve the "orphan" instability of divergent cset by relocating, then perform the content-divergence resolution. After this change in logic, I found that it's kind of more correct as reflected by the changes in tests/test-evolve-content-divergent-corner-cases.t where it prevented creating conflicts while merging. Changes in tests/test-evolve-content-divergent-stack.t demonstrate the fixed behaviour. Next patches will be covering the `evolve --continue` case for the relocation of "divergent" cset.

evolve: add test to demonstrate issue6203 Current logic of content-divergence resolution contains a bug that if resolution parent is not the parent of any of the two divergent changesets, it could undo some changes. I think a good solution for this is to first relocate the divergent cset to it's obsolete parent's successor if applicable and then perform the content-divergence resolution. Next patch will fix the issue.

state: there's no _unpack in struct Caught by pytype.

amend: abort if both --patch and --extract are used

test-compat: merge mercurial-4.6 into mercurial-4.5

ci: add job to build and archive the documentation

tests: update now that merge.graft() doesn't set two equal parents This is a consequence of https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7549. CORE-TEST-OUTPUT-UPDATE: 32d11a23c9cf

evolve: fix content-divergence resolution when p1 is null (issue6201) Before this fix, in cases like in the added test, the revision number -1 of the parent was misinterpreted to mean the tipmost revision instead of the null revision, causing the content-divergence resolution to fail.