Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 07 May 2020 07:57:14 -0700] rev 5344
evolve: mark new hash-salting extras keys as uninteresting for effect flag
The user doesn't care if the
`evolve_source_local`/`evolve_source_other` values in the extras
changed, so this patch adds them to the blacklist that already exists
for that purpose.
This should also fix the flakiness we've seen in some tests. The
flakiness seemed to stem from `mercurial.obsutil.geteffectflag()` not
sorting extras keys. That means we ran into it relatively often for
the `evolve_source_local`/`evolve_source_other` keys because there
were two of them. That sorting bug should be fixed upstream.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 09 Dec 2019 11:09:11 -0800] rev 5343
evolve: handle relocation during divergence resolution producing no changes
When resolving divergence and the two divergent commits have different
parents, we start by rebasing one of them to have the same parent as
the other. That step can result in no changes to commit. When it does,
we would crash with a TypeError before this patch.
This patch fixes it by instead creating an empty commit in that
scenario. The existing code then continues to attempt to merge it,
which produces no changes, and no commit is created on top. The other
side of the divergence is marked as successor as usual, so orphans
from the side that became empty will be evolved to the right place
(see test).
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 09 Dec 2019 10:05:24 -0800] rev 5342
tests: show crash from divergence resolution resulting in empty commit
When relocating a commit results in an empty commit (because the
changes are already in the destination), we get a TypeError from
evolve.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 30 Apr 2020 10:05:14 -0700] rev 5341
evolve: always create commit when resolving divergence
When resolving content-divergence, the final commit we create may end
up empty (which means that Mercurial won't even create it). We've had
code for handling that in evolve ever since 41bf6c27a122 (evolve:
stabilize now handle conflicting changeset, 2012-08-23). However, that
resolved the issue by marking on the divergent commits as
successor. As Pierre-Yves has pointed out (in other code reviews), we
should instead be creating a new successor. So that's what this patch
does. It does that by setting `ui.allowemptycommit` while creating the
final commit. However, that is not enough, because we may end up
creating the same nodeid as already existed (we'd then end up trying
to mark the "new" commit a successor of itself). To solve that, we add
some salt to the commit extras. That salt affects lots of tests.
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Tue, 05 May 2020 16:29:52 +0800] rev 5340
tests: replace an X+X revset with something meaningful
The change in aab2afc2bd82 seem to have been make too hastily.
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Tue, 05 May 2020 16:54:24 +0800] rev 5339
tests: update section headers and comments in obslog-related tests
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Tue, 05 May 2020 16:52:59 +0800] rev 5338
tests: use common obshistory_setup.sh script instead of manual setup
This is now consistent with other test-evolve-obshistory*.t tests.
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Tue, 05 May 2020 16:27:02 +0800] rev 5337
tests: remove "second diverged revision" from a phase divergence test
It was basically testing the same thing twice with a different comment.
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Tue, 05 May 2020 15:43:43 +0800] rev 5336
obshistory: omit duplicate notes of obsolescence operations
When folding changesets, it's possible to provide a --note flag to e.g. fold or
prune, which will store a note for that operation. But since there would be
more than one marker for the fold operation and the provided note would be
stored in all of them, _markersnotes() previously would return the same text
message many times. We don't really want to see the same thing over and over,
so let's make notes a set().
This will also make unrelated operations with the same note show the message
only once, which is probably an improvement too.
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Tue, 05 May 2020 20:25:33 +0200] rev 5335
changelog: adjust
The changes only apply to newly created sqlite database. There are code
pathes that drop existing ones, but that's a more complicated condition.