prune: update to the successor of wdir also with --pair/--biject (issue6142)
When prune is used with --pair flag, we can also update to the successor of
working directory parent.
No need to check len(sucs) or len(precs) here because there's a check for that
earlier in the code (it's a requirement of biject).
The tests are now demonstrate the correct behavior: when rev 14 was pruned with
12 as its successor, the bookmark that was on 14 was moved to 12. That bookmark
was also activated (even before this patch).
$ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
> [ui]
> logtemplate={rev}:{node|short} {desc}\n
> [defaults]
> amend=-d "0 0"
> [extensions]
> hgext.rebase=
> EOF
$ echo "evolve=$(echo $(dirname $TESTDIR))/hgext3rd/evolve/" >> $HGRCPATH
$ hg init repo
$ cd repo
$ echo A > a
$ hg add a
$ hg commit -m a
Basic usage
$ hg log -G
@ 0:[0-9a-f]{12} a (re)
$ hg touch .
$ hg log -G
@ 1:[0-9a-f]{12} a (re)
Revive usage
$ echo A > b
$ hg add b
$ hg commit -m ab --amend
$ hg up --hidden 1
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
updated to hidden changeset * (glob)
(hidden revision '*' was rewritten as: *) (glob)
working directory parent is obsolete! (*) (glob)
(use 'hg evolve' to update to its successor: *) (glob)
$ hg log -G
o 2:[0-9a-f]{12} ab (re)
@ 1:[0-9a-f]{12} a (re)
$ hg touch .
[1] a
reviving this changeset will create divergence unless you make a duplicate.
(a)llow divergence or (d)uplicate the changeset? a
2 new content-divergent changesets
$ hg log -G
@ 3:[0-9a-f]{12} a (re)
\* 2:[0-9a-f]{12} ab (re)
$ hg prune 3
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
working directory is now at 000000000000
1 changesets pruned
Duplicate
$ hg touch --duplicate .
$ hg log -G
@ 4:[0-9a-f]{12} (re)
o 2:[0-9a-f]{12} ab (re)
Multiple touch
$ echo C > c
$ hg add c
$ hg commit -m c
$ echo D > d
$ hg add d
$ hg commit -m d
$ hg log -G
@ 6:[0-9a-f]{12} d (re)
|
o 5:[0-9a-f]{12} c (re)
|
o 4:[0-9a-f]{12} (re)
o 2:[0-9a-f]{12} ab (re)
$ hg touch .^:.
$ hg log -G
@ 8:[0-9a-f]{12} d (re)
|
o 7:[0-9a-f]{12} c (re)
|
o 4:[0-9a-f]{12} (re)
o 2:[0-9a-f]{12} ab (re)
check move data kept after rebase on touch:
$ touch gna1
$ hg commit -Am gna1
adding gna1
$ hg mv gna1 gna2
$ hg commit -m move
$ hg st -C --change=tip
A gna2
gna1
R gna1
$ hg up .^
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg touch
1 new orphan changesets
$ hg log -G --hidden
@ 11:[0-9a-f]{12} gna1 (re)
|
. \* 10:[0-9a-f]{12} move (re)
| |
. x 9:[0-9a-f]{12} gna1 (re)
|/
o 8:[0-9a-f]{12} d (re)
|
o 7:[0-9a-f]{12} c (re)
|
. x 6:[0-9a-f]{12} d (re)
| |
. x 5:[0-9a-f]{12} c (re)
|/
o 4:[0-9a-f]{12} (re)
x 3:[0-9a-f]{12} a (re)
o 2:[0-9a-f]{12} ab (re)
x 1:[0-9a-f]{12} a (re)
x 0:[0-9a-f]{12} a (re)
$ hg rebase -s 10 -d 11
rebasing 10:[0-9a-f]{12} "move" (re)
$ hg st -C --change=tip
A gna2
gna1
R gna1
check that the --duplicate option does not create divergence
$ hg touch --duplicate 10 --hidden
1 new orphan changesets
check that reviving a changeset with no successor does not show the prompt
$ hg prune 13
1 changesets pruned
$ hg touch 13 --hidden --note "testing with no successor"
1 new orphan changesets
$ hg obslog -r 13 --hidden
x [0-9a-f]{12} (.*) move (re)
pruned using prune by test (Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000)
rewritten(.*) as [0-9a-f]{12} using touch by test (.*) (re)
note: testing with no successor
Public phase
$ hg phase --public -r 2
$ hg touch 2
abort: cannot touch public changesets: * (glob)
(see 'hg help phases' for details)
[255]
$ hg touch --duplicate 2