stablerange: fallback to a more naive approach to find subrange
As suspected, using "bheads" was bit good enough in some case and we have to
fall back to the approach used in "basic".
On the evolve repo (about 3K changeset) this approach is about 60% slower than
the previous (wrong) code.
all: tutorials/tutorial.rst tutorials/topic-tutorial.rst static/logo-evolve.ico
sphinx-build . ../html/
tutorials/tutorial.rst: tutorials/tutorial.t test2rst.py
python test2rst.py tutorials/
tutorials/topic-tutorial.rst: tutorials/topic-tutorial.t test2rst.py
python test2rst.py tutorials/
static/logo-evolve.ico: static/logo-evolve.svg
convert -resize 36x36 static/logo-evolve.svg static/logo-evolve.ico