checkheahds: switch algorithm to use pushed markers instead
We now checks if markers involved in the push are relevant to nodes in the
branch we try to replace. The approach is simpler and more robust.
A test showing the limitation of the previous approach is added.
$ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
> [defaults]
> amend=-d "0 0"
> [extensions]
> hgext.graphlog=
> EOF
$ echo "evolve=$(echo $(dirname $TESTDIR))/hgext3rd/evolve/" >> $HGRCPATH
$ template='{rev}:{node|short}@{branch}({separate("/", obsolete, phase)}) {desc|firstline}\n'
$ glog() {
> hg glog --template "$template" "$@"
> }
Test outgoing, common A is suspended, B unstable and C secret, remote
has A and B, neither A or C should be in outgoing.
$ hg init source
$ cd source
$ echo a > a
$ hg ci -qAm A a
$ echo b > b
$ hg ci -qAm B b
$ hg up 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo c > c
$ hg ci -qAm C c
$ hg phase --secret --force .
$ hg prune 0 1
2 changesets pruned
1 new unstable changesets
$ glog --hidden
@ 2:244232c2222a@default(secret) C
|
| x 1:6c81ed0049f8@default(obsolete/draft) B
|/
x 0:1994f17a630e@default(obsolete/draft) A
$ hg init ../clone
$ cat > ../clone/.hg/hgrc <<EOF
> [phases]
> publish = false
> EOF
$ hg outgoing ../clone --template "$template"
comparing with ../clone
searching for changes
0:1994f17a630e@default(obsolete/draft) A