tests/test-obsolete-push.t
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org>
Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:46:51 +0200
changeset 2256 7ec214ea5d67
parent 1806 9f42f819267b
child 2111 ec04eb4d2c6e
child 2286 a4c5744a7b93
permissions -rw-r--r--
checkheahds: switch algorithm to use pushed markers instead We now checks if markers involved in the push are relevant to nodes in the branch we try to replace. The approach is simpler and more robust. A test showing the limitation of the previous approach is added.

  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
  > [defaults]
  > amend=-d "0 0"
  > [extensions]
  > hgext.graphlog=
  > EOF
  $ echo "evolve=$(echo $(dirname $TESTDIR))/hgext3rd/evolve/" >> $HGRCPATH

  $ template='{rev}:{node|short}@{branch}({separate("/", obsolete, phase)}) {desc|firstline}\n'
  $ glog() {
  >   hg glog --template "$template" "$@"
  > }

Test outgoing, common A is suspended, B unstable and C secret, remote
has A and B, neither A or C should be in outgoing.

  $ hg init source
  $ cd source
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg ci -qAm A a
  $ echo b > b
  $ hg ci -qAm B b
  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo c > c
  $ hg ci -qAm C c
  $ hg phase --secret --force .
  $ hg prune 0 1
  2 changesets pruned
  1 new unstable changesets
  $ glog --hidden
  @  2:244232c2222a@default(secret) C
  |
  | x  1:6c81ed0049f8@default(obsolete/draft) B
  |/
  x  0:1994f17a630e@default(obsolete/draft) A
  
  $ hg init ../clone
  $ cat >  ../clone/.hg/hgrc <<EOF
  > [phases]
  > publish = false
  > EOF
  $ hg outgoing ../clone --template "$template"
  comparing with ../clone
  searching for changes
  0:1994f17a630e@default(obsolete/draft) A