tests/test-topic-flow-reject-untopiced.t
author Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net>
Fri, 07 Jun 2019 18:14:48 +0800
branchstable
changeset 4687 313565dd75e3
parent 3280 e642bad8174a
child 4840 62b60fc1983d
permissions -rw-r--r--
pick: remove transaction on the whole command (issue6037) At its core, pick is a pretty straightforward and well-behaving command, it uses functions already in core hg, it checks that wdir is clean and that changeset to pick is not public, it checks if there happen to be merge conflicts and can be --continue'd later, etc. It is very similar to graft in core (it also uses mergemod.graft function), but it obsoletes the original changeset. However, graft does not experience this incorrect behavior from issue 6037. What happens in the test case for this issue when we pick a revision that touches both "a" and "b": mergemod.graft() takes the original changeset and tries to apply it to the wdir, which results in "b" being marked as newly added and ready to be committed, "a" updated with the new content and being marked as modified, but "a" also has conflicts. Pick correctly notices this and saves its state before asking for user intervention. So far so good. However, when the command raises InterventionRequired to print a user-facing message and exit while being wrapped in repo.transaction() context manager, the latter partially undoes what mergemod.graft() did: it unmarks "b" as added. And when user continues pick, "b" is therefore not tracked and is not included in the resulting commit. The transaction is not useful here, because it doesn't touch wdir (it's still dirty), it doesn't remove pickstate (and other commands will refuse to work until pick --abort or --continue), it just makes "b" untracked. The solution is to use repo.transaction() only to wrap code that writes data to hg store in the final stages of the command after all checks have passed and is not expected to fail on trivial cases like merge conflicts. For example, committing the picked changeset. But since pick uses repo.commit() for that, and because that function already uses a transaction, wrapping it in another transaction doesn't make sense.

Testing the config option for rejecting draft changeset without topic
The config option is "experimental.topic-mode.server"

  $ . "$TESTDIR/testlib/topic_setup.sh"

Creating a server repo

  $ hg init server
  $ cd server
  $ cat <<EOF >>.hg/hgrc
  > [phases]
  > publish=False
  > [experimental]
  > topic-mode.server = enforce
  > EOF

  $ hg topic server
  marked working directory as topic: server
  $ for ch in a b c; do echo foo > $ch; hg ci -Aqm "Added "$ch; done
  $ hg ph -p 0

  $ hg log -G -T "{rev}:{node|short}\n{desc}  {topics}"
  @  2:a7b96f87a214
  |  Added c  server
  o  1:d6a8197e192a
  |  Added b  server
  o  0:49a3f206c9ae
     Added a

  $ cd ..

Creating a client repo

  $ hg clone server client
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd client
  $ hg up server
  switching to topic server
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -G -T "{rev}:{node|short}\n{desc}  {topics}"
  @  2:a7b96f87a214
  |  Added c  server
  o  1:d6a8197e192a
  |  Added b  server
  o  0:49a3f206c9ae
     Added a

  $ hg topic
   * server (2 changesets)

Create a changeset without topic

  $ hg topic --clear
  $ echo foo > d
  $ hg ci -Aqm "added d"

  $ hg log -G -T "{rev}:{node|short}\n{desc}  {topics}"
  @  3:4e8b0e0237c6
  |  added d
  o  2:a7b96f87a214
  |  Added c  server
  o  1:d6a8197e192a
  |  Added b  server
  o  0:49a3f206c9ae
     Added a

Push a draft changeset without topic

  $ hg push ../server  --new-branch
  pushing to ../server
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  transaction abort!
  rollback completed
  abort: rejecting draft changesets: 4e8b0e0237
  [255]

  $ hg push ../server -f
  pushing to ../server
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  transaction abort!
  rollback completed
  abort: rejecting draft changesets: 4e8b0e0237
  [255]

Grow the stack with more changesets having topic

  $ hg topic client
  marked working directory as topic: client
  $ for ch in e f g; do echo foo > $ch; hg ci -Aqm "Added "$ch; done;

  $ hg log -G -T "{rev}:{node|short}\n{desc}  {topics}"
  @  6:42c4ac86452a
  |  Added g  client
  o  5:3dc456efb491
  |  Added f  client
  o  4:18a516babc60
  |  Added e  client
  o  3:4e8b0e0237c6
  |  added d
  o  2:a7b96f87a214
  |  Added c  server
  o  1:d6a8197e192a
  |  Added b  server
  o  0:49a3f206c9ae
     Added a

Pushing multiple changeset with some having topics and some not

  $ hg push ../server --new-branch
  pushing to ../server
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 4 files
  transaction abort!
  rollback completed
  abort: rejecting draft changesets: 4e8b0e0237
  [255]

Testing case when both experimental.topic-mode.server and
experimental.topic.publish-bare-branch are set

  $ cd ../server
  $ echo 'topic.publish-bare-branch=True' >> .hg/hgrc
  $ cd ../client
  $ hg push ../server --new-branch
  pushing to ../server
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 4 files
  transaction abort!
  rollback completed
  abort: rejecting draft changesets: 4e8b0e0237
  [255]

Turning the changeset public and testing push

  $ hg phase -r 3 -p
  $ hg log -G -T "{rev}:{node|short}\n{desc}  {topics}"
  @  6:42c4ac86452a
  |  Added g  client
  o  5:3dc456efb491
  |  Added f  client
  o  4:18a516babc60
  |  Added e  client
  o  3:4e8b0e0237c6
  |  added d
  o  2:a7b96f87a214
  |  Added c
  o  1:d6a8197e192a
  |  Added b
  o  0:49a3f206c9ae
     Added a

  $ hg push ../server
  pushing to ../server
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 4 files
  active topic 'server' is now empty