tests/test-evolve-orphan-corner-cases.t
author Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net>
Fri, 07 Jun 2019 18:14:48 +0800
branchstable
changeset 4687 313565dd75e3
parent 4660 b62ed7c69561
child 4675 79bc0f1a832e
permissions -rw-r--r--
pick: remove transaction on the whole command (issue6037) At its core, pick is a pretty straightforward and well-behaving command, it uses functions already in core hg, it checks that wdir is clean and that changeset to pick is not public, it checks if there happen to be merge conflicts and can be --continue'd later, etc. It is very similar to graft in core (it also uses mergemod.graft function), but it obsoletes the original changeset. However, graft does not experience this incorrect behavior from issue 6037. What happens in the test case for this issue when we pick a revision that touches both "a" and "b": mergemod.graft() takes the original changeset and tries to apply it to the wdir, which results in "b" being marked as newly added and ready to be committed, "a" updated with the new content and being marked as modified, but "a" also has conflicts. Pick correctly notices this and saves its state before asking for user intervention. So far so good. However, when the command raises InterventionRequired to print a user-facing message and exit while being wrapped in repo.transaction() context manager, the latter partially undoes what mergemod.graft() did: it unmarks "b" as added. And when user continues pick, "b" is therefore not tracked and is not included in the resulting commit. The transaction is not useful here, because it doesn't touch wdir (it's still dirty), it doesn't remove pickstate (and other commands will refuse to work until pick --abort or --continue), it just makes "b" untracked. The solution is to use repo.transaction() only to wrap code that writes data to hg store in the final stages of the command after all checks have passed and is not expected to fail on trivial cases like merge conflicts. For example, committing the picked changeset. But since pick uses repo.commit() for that, and because that function already uses a transaction, wrapping it in another transaction doesn't make sense.

=======================================================
Tests the resolution of orphan changesets: corner cases
=======================================================

Setup
=====
  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
  > [alias]
  > glog = log -GT "{rev}:{node|short} {desc|firstline}\n {phase} {troubles}\n\n"
  > [phases]
  > publish = False
  > [extensions]
  > rebase =
  > EOF
  $ echo "evolve=$(echo $(dirname $TESTDIR))/hgext3rd/evolve/" >> $HGRCPATH

  $ glog() {
  >   hg log -G --template '{rev}:{node|short}@{branch}({phase}) {desc|firstline}\n' "$@"
  > }

Test to make sure that `lastsolved` always has correct value and things don't break:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(before we were not updating it in case of orphan merge)

Prepare the repo:
  $ hg init orphanmergerepo
  $ cd orphanmergerepo
  $ for fn in a b c; do echo foo > $fn; hg ci -Am "added "$fn; done;
  adding a
  adding b
  adding c
Let's create a merge commit so that we can create orphan merge later:
  $ hg up 1 -q
  $ echo feature > f
  $ hg ci -Am "added feature f"
  adding f
  created new head
  $ hg merge
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -m "merge feature branch"
  $ glog
  @    4:2c0a98d38026@default(draft) merge feature branch
  |\
  | o  3:4c33e511041e@default(draft) added feature f
  | |
  o |  2:8be98ac1a569@default(draft) added c
  |/
  o  1:80e6d2c47cfe@default(draft) added b
  |
  o  0:f7ad41964313@default(draft) added a
  

Now make the parents of merge commit obsolete to get a orphan merge:
  $ hg up 2 -q
  $ echo "fixit" > c
  $ hg ci --amend -m "updated c"
  1 new orphan changesets
  $ hg up 3 -q
  $ echo "fixit" > c
  $ hg ci --amend -m "updated f"
  $ glog
  @  6:086d9bedcd75@default(draft) updated f
  |
  | o  5:f84f2c548fbc@default(draft) updated c
  |/
  | *    4:2c0a98d38026@default(draft) merge feature branch
  | |\
  +---x  3:4c33e511041e@default(draft) added feature f
  | |
  | x  2:8be98ac1a569@default(draft) added c
  |/
  o  1:80e6d2c47cfe@default(draft) added b
  |
  o  0:f7ad41964313@default(draft) added a
  

To check `lastsolved` contain right value after completion of orphan-merge
resolution there should be one more instability to be evolved; lets create one:
  $ hg up 1 -q
  $ echo d > d
  $ hg ci -Am "added d"
  adding c
  adding d
  created new head
  $ echo e > e
  $ hg ci -Am "added e"
  adding e
  $ hg up .^
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo "updated d" >> d
  $ hg ci --amend -m "updated d"
  1 new orphan changesets
  $ glog
  @  9:7c4d1834c346@default(draft) updated d
  |
  | *  8:421f7614462a@default(draft) added e
  | |
  | x  7:afe5acea1990@default(draft) added d
  |/
  | o  6:086d9bedcd75@default(draft) updated f
  |/
  | o  5:f84f2c548fbc@default(draft) updated c
  |/
  | *    4:2c0a98d38026@default(draft) merge feature branch
  | |\
  +---x  3:4c33e511041e@default(draft) added feature f
  | |
  | x  2:8be98ac1a569@default(draft) added c
  |/
  o  1:80e6d2c47cfe@default(draft) added b
  |
  o  0:f7ad41964313@default(draft) added a
  
Now we have one orphan merge and one more orphan cset that we just created.
Lets evolve:
  $ hg evolve --all --any
  move:[4] merge feature branch
  atop:[5] updated c
  move:[10] merge feature branch
  atop:[6] updated f
  move:[8] added e
  atop:[9] updated d