Wed, 27 Mar 2013 19:54:36 +0100 [session] use a dedicated class to track cnxset
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Wed, 27 Mar 2013 19:54:36 +0100] rev 8809
[session] use a dedicated class to track cnxset We introduce a new CnxSetTracker to track `cnxset` used by Transaction and allows to wait for them. This new class does not use Thread ID not thread joining to work. This allows to use multiple transaction per thread and a transaction in multiple thread. The class itself is totally threadsafe by the Transaction is still not thread safe. The old _threads_in_transaction attribute is dropped in favor of a new logic based on this object. The registration of cnxset used is not done by the Transaction itself. tx.cnset is a property handling the Consistency of its value with the CnxSetTracker instance. Note: The CnxSetTracker instance only track transaction id, not transaction itself, So not reference cycle are created.
Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:26:29 +0100 [session] cleanup Transaction.cnxset
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:26:29 +0100] rev 8808
[session] cleanup Transaction.cnxset The attribute should always be there. It is None when not cnxset exists.
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:50:11 +0100 [session] drop useless getter and setter for security
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:50:11 +0100] rev 8807
[session] drop useless getter and setter for security Those function have very few user and does not anything fancy. Internal user now access tx.read/write_security directly. External user have been blessed with a writable property. They are only interested in the write part of they did not used the return of the removed function. They access it through the session since I prefer the external world to not be aware of Transaction yet.
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 19:40:09 +0100 [session/transaction] move read_security subtlety in transaction
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Wed, 27 Mar 2013 19:40:09 +0100] rev 8806
[session/transaction] move read_security subtlety in transaction This is transaction data, itshould be handled by the transaction itself.
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:08:02 +0100 [transaction] initialize dbapi_request in __init__
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:08:02 +0100] rev 8805
[transaction] initialize dbapi_request in __init__ There is not reason to have it implicitly declared. The attribute is renamed to match its public name.
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:00:25 +0100 [whatsnew] notify drop of deprecated code
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:00:25 +0100] rev 8804
[whatsnew] notify drop of deprecated code
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:33:48 +0100 [web/views] extract cube embed (closes #1916015)
Vladimir Popescu <vladimir.popescu@logilab.fr> [Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:33:48 +0100] rev 8803
[web/views] extract cube embed (closes #1916015)
Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:26:12 +0100 [skeleton] Update debian packaging to support only python 2.6 and up
Rémi Cardona <remi.cardona@logilab.fr> [Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:26:12 +0100] rev 8802
[skeleton] Update debian packaging to support only python 2.6 and up
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:58:13 +0100 Drop iprogress code (closes #2777628)
Rémi Cardona <remi.cardona@logilab.fr> [Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:58:13 +0100] rev 8801
Drop iprogress code (closes #2777628)
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:36:47 +0100 [web/views] extract cube sioc (closes #1916018)
Simon Chabot <simon.chabot@logilab.fr> [Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:36:47 +0100] rev 8800
[web/views] extract cube sioc (closes #1916018)
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip