Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:36:16 +0200 [rql2sql] when using HAVING to by-pass rql limitation (not to filter on result of an aggregat function), we should emit SQL that doesn't use HAVING to avoid potential backend error because variables are not grouped. Closes #1061603. stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:36:16 +0200] rev 5782
[rql2sql] when using HAVING to by-pass rql limitation (not to filter on result of an aggregat function), we should emit SQL that doesn't use HAVING to avoid potential backend error because variables are not grouped. Closes #1061603.
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:49:58 +0200 [doc/book/faq] question on security stable
Aurelien Campeas <aurelien.campeas@logilab.fr> [Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:49:58 +0200] rev 5781
[doc/book/faq] question on security
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:57:24 +0200 [qunit] check that the browser has not died by himself before we asked him to stop.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:57:24 +0200] rev 5780
[qunit] check that the browser has not died by himself before we asked him to stop.
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -3 +3 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip