Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:43:16 +0100 [css] fix disappearing image in menu when a:hover stable
Charles Hébert <charles.hebert@logilab.fr> [Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:43:16 +0100] rev 4657
[css] fix disappearing image in menu when a:hover
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:41:06 +0100 [cwctl] modify command list to check for cube dependency problems stable
Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> [Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:41:06 +0100] rev 4656
[cwctl] modify command list to check for cube dependency problems
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:57:51 +0100 merge stable
Alexandre Fayolle <alexandre.fayolle@logilab.fr> [Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:57:51 +0100] rev 4655
merge
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:54:04 +0100 docstring improvement stable
Alexandre Fayolle <alexandre.fayolle@logilab.fr> [Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:54:04 +0100] rev 4654
docstring improvement
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:53:01 +0100 import cleanup stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:53:01 +0100] rev 4653
import cleanup
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:52:38 +0100 restore 3.5 compat for date functions moved to lgc.date in 3.6 (closes #716055) stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:52:38 +0100] rev 4652
restore 3.5 compat for date functions moved to lgc.date in 3.6 (closes #716055)
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:25:04 +0100 [devtools/fill] fix date generation and its test stable
Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> [Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:25:04 +0100] rev 4651
[devtools/fill] fix date generation and its test
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:22:54 +0100 typo: capitalize migration confirmation messages stable
Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> [Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:22:54 +0100] rev 4650
typo: capitalize migration confirmation messages
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:12:46 +0100 [views/deleteconf] remove action ppty (useless & clashes with form attr, replace buggy non_final_entity selector with implements workaround stable
Aurelien Campeas <aurelien.campeas@logilab.fr> [Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:12:46 +0100] rev 4649
[views/deleteconf] remove action ppty (useless & clashes with form attr, replace buggy non_final_entity selector with implements workaround
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:53:35 +0100 merge stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:53:35 +0100] rev 4648
merge
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:12:33 +0100 [workflow] fix potential destination for go back transition stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:12:33 +0100] rev 4647
[workflow] fix potential destination for go back transition
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:04:24 +0100 [workflow] finish refactoring introduced by 021035b9a7ab for 'go back' transition: stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:04:24 +0100] rev 4646
[workflow] finish refactoring introduced by 021035b9a7ab for 'go back' transition: * fix SubWorkflowTransition.destination() prototype (must now take an entity as argument) * fix the change state for to give the entity to the transition's destination() method * we need a new method to draw workflow since we've no entity to give and 'go back' transition usually go back to multiple states
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:37:03 +0100 deprecate Transition.set_transition_permissions in favor of set_permissions (after all we know we're on a transition entity) stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:37:03 +0100] rev 4645
deprecate Transition.set_transition_permissions in favor of set_permissions (after all we know we're on a transition entity)
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:36:26 +0100 introduce 'go back' transition: transition without destination state will go to the state we were coming from stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:36:26 +0100] rev 4644
introduce 'go back' transition: transition without destination state will go to the state we were coming from
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:34:14 +0100 fix optimisation with super session that may lead to integrity loss stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:34:14 +0100] rev 4643
fix optimisation with super session that may lead to integrity loss at some point I've decided to stop ensuring ?1 cardinality was respected when adding a new relation using a super session, to avoid the cost of the delete query. That was yet discussable because it introduced unexpected difference between execute and unsafe_execute, which is imo not worth it. Also, now that rql() in migration script default to unsafe_execute, we definitly don't want that implicit behaviour change (which already cause bug when for instance adding another default workflow for an entity type: without that fix we end up with *two* default workflows while the schema tells we can have only one. IMO we should go to the direction that super session skip all security check, but nothing else, unless explicitly asked.
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:14:35 +0100 [auto/inline forms] reallow nested inline forms #703910 stable
Aurelien Campeas <aurelien.campeas@logilab.fr> [Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:14:35 +0100] rev 4642
[auto/inline forms] reallow nested inline forms #703910
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:42:29 +0100 [reledit] fix #713217: reledit doesn't check 'update' permission on attributes stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:42:29 +0100] rev 4641
[reledit] fix #713217: reledit doesn't check 'update' permission on attributes
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:42:09 +0100 fix dumb name error stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:42:09 +0100] rev 4640
fix dumb name error
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:27:00 +0100 cleanup internal forms parameters in postlogin stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:27:00 +0100] rev 4639
cleanup internal forms parameters in postlogin
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:07:56 +0100 grmmbl, bad resolve stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:07:56 +0100] rev 4638
grmmbl, bad resolve
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:06:17 +0100 missed conflict stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:06:17 +0100] rev 4637
missed conflict
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:02:48 +0100 backport lost stable head stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:02:48 +0100] rev 4636
backport lost stable head
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:31:03 +0100 fix sync_schema_props_perms test stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:31:03 +0100] rev 4635
fix sync_schema_props_perms test
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:30:37 +0100 fix create_user function introduced in d6ae30c5d055 for database initialization: messup admin user groups when anon is created due to missing restriction stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:30:37 +0100] rev 4634
fix create_user function introduced in d6ae30c5d055 for database initialization: messup admin user groups when anon is created due to missing restriction
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:28:38 +0100 3.6 api update stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:28:38 +0100] rev 4633
3.6 api update
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:58:52 +0100 fix unittest_hooks: attributes have now update_permission instead of [add/delete]_permission stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:58:52 +0100] rev 4632
fix unittest_hooks: attributes have now update_permission instead of [add/delete]_permission
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:57:57 +0100 when modifying a persistent schema, erschema may miss some permissions which wil trigger a key error, but we don't want to crash on such cases stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:57:57 +0100] rev 4631
when modifying a persistent schema, erschema may miss some permissions which wil trigger a key error, but we don't want to crash on such cases
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:52:34 +0100 fix #694445: related entity generates weird RQL which in turn generates weird SQL which fails on SQL Server stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:52:34 +0100] rev 4630
fix #694445: related entity generates weird RQL which in turn generates weird SQL which fails on SQL Server quick fix to reuse modification_date if already retreived by the rql query.
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:13:36 +0100 fix 4626:c26b4df9fc90 (#703911): use can't rely on peid since it's not an actual eid when we're creating the parent entity stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:13:36 +0100] rev 4629
fix 4626:c26b4df9fc90 (#703911): use can't rely on peid since it's not an actual eid when we're creating the parent entity
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:08:00 +0100 [form fields] nicer behaviour of the password field: don't put internal field value on edition (triggering validation error if one validation without removing the value, due to confirmation mismatch), and don't show the field as required in such case stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:08:00 +0100] rev 4628
[form fields] nicer behaviour of the password field: don't put internal field value on edition (triggering validation error if one validation without removing the value, due to confirmation mismatch), and don't show the field as required in such case
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:06:40 +0100 minor cleanup: don't use builtin 'id' as variable name stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:06:40 +0100] rev 4627
minor cleanup: don't use builtin 'id' as variable name
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:57:50 +0100 [forms/inline] fix #703911: add new link disappears if inline box removed. Since we've the information, we must specify the target type else we get random cardinality on ambiguous relations stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:57:50 +0100] rev 4626
[forms/inline] fix #703911: add new link disappears if inline box removed. Since we've the information, we must specify the target type else we get random cardinality on ambiguous relations
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -32 +32 +50 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip