Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:30:23 +0100 [fix] Apply fulltextindexed change in the actual index stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:30:23 +0100] rev 4667
[fix] Apply fulltextindexed change in the actual index Change of the fulltextindexed attribute of a CWAttribute did actually change anything for already existing entity (but apply to new one). This patch fix this behaviour: * A new SingleLastOperation, UpdateFTIndexOp, to reindex entity whose ftindexation changed during a commit. This data is read from session.transaction_data['fti_update_etypes'] * The SourceDbRDefUpdate operation to store Etype who modify they fulltextindexed of attribute in session.transaction_data['fti_update_etypes']. * A new test is added to check the behaviour
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:40:55 +0100 3.6 api update (introduced by merge) stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:40:55 +0100] rev 4666
3.6 api update (introduced by merge)
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:19:16 +0100 when validating a form, we should properly call 'actual_fields(form) on edited field else compound field are not correctly processed stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:19:16 +0100] rev 4665
when validating a form, we should properly call 'actual_fields(form) on edited field else compound field are not correctly processed
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:59:30 +0100 #714109: [selectors] non_final_entity should implement score_class stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:59:30 +0100] rev 4664
#714109: [selectors] non_final_entity should implement score_class
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:52:57 +0100 merge stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:52:57 +0100] rev 4663
merge
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:52:40 +0100 add XXX note stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:52:40 +0100] rev 4662
add XXX note
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:51:20 +0100 [form] cache field value in form.formvalues using (field, form) key since in some case the same field instance may be shared accross multiple forms, which may share the formvalues dict in case of sub-forms stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:51:20 +0100] rev 4661
[form] cache field value in form.formvalues using (field, form) key since in some case the same field instance may be shared accross multiple forms, which may share the formvalues dict in case of sub-forms
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:49:37 +0100 cleanup stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:49:37 +0100] rev 4660
cleanup
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:46:56 +0100 [form] complete 25de2eb0432b by ignore req parameters by default for all hidden fields stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:46:56 +0100] rev 4659
[form] complete 25de2eb0432b by ignore req parameters by default for all hidden fields
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:43:15 +0100 [form] add a new ignore_req_params attribute on field controlling value's retreival stable
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:43:15 +0100] rev 4658
[form] add a new ignore_req_params attribute on field controlling value's retreival for such field, such as eid/__type in entity forms, we don't want to consider values from req.form since we may get undesired value (as reported by #714766). This new attribute allow do specify that we don't want to consider req.form in such case. Also, it seems that retreival of form values after a validation error suffer from the same problem, so don't use form_previous_values for field with ignore_req_params set to True (XXX though I suppose that may not be correct in some cases).
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip