Thu, 08 Oct 2015 18:09:10 +0200 [devtools] Use TestCase.assertGreater
Rémi Cardona <remi.cardona@logilab.fr> [Thu, 08 Oct 2015 18:09:10 +0200] rev 10638
[devtools] Use TestCase.assertGreater
Wed, 09 Sep 2015 08:32:49 +0200 [autoform] fix appearance of link to add inlined creation form
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Wed, 09 Sep 2015 08:32:49 +0200] rev 10637
[autoform] fix appearance of link to add inlined creation form On entity creation, if there are some local permissions on the relation, we have no way of checking them since neither the subject nor the object of the relation exists yet. In such a case, we should add the link by default, for consistency (see other places where we use `may_have_permission`). Closes #6711900
Thu, 08 Oct 2015 11:47:15 +0200 [predicates] Simplify specified_etype_implements
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 08 Oct 2015 11:47:15 +0200] rev 10636
[predicates] Simplify specified_etype_implements
Thu, 08 Oct 2015 12:13:35 +0200 [web/views] Fix `has_editable_relation` predicate wrt inlined relations
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 08 Oct 2015 12:13:35 +0200] rev 10635
[web/views] Fix `has_editable_relation` predicate wrt inlined relations Prevents the "modify" action from being shown when there is nothing to edit.
Wed, 02 Sep 2015 15:31:18 +0200 [web/views] avoid propagation of NoSelectableObject in some case of inlined relations / permissions
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Wed, 02 Sep 2015 15:31:18 +0200] rev 10634
[web/views] avoid propagation of NoSelectableObject in some case of inlined relations / permissions When selecting an inlined creation form, we should catch the NoSelectable exception that will be raised if the user cannot add entities of the target type (this is not and cannot be verified earlier) or if some other custom selector prevents the form from being selected. Closes #6510921
Wed, 07 Oct 2015 17:27:35 +0200 [server/test] bit of PEP8
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Wed, 07 Oct 2015 17:27:35 +0200] rev 10633
[server/test] bit of PEP8
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:11:34 +0200 [migration] don't attempt to carry over values when renaming a computed relation
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:11:34 +0200] rev 10632
[migration] don't attempt to carry over values when renaming a computed relation Without the fix in migractions.py, the introduced test crashes with an operational error because of an attempt to write to a non-existing relation table (computed relations are not materialized). Closes #6304946
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:01:08 +0200 consider .do_fti flag in index_entity method
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:01:08 +0200] rev 10631
consider .do_fti flag in index_entity method as this method may be used from outsite the class (eg in UpdateFTIHook), this is the proper way to consider it anyway. Closes #6206636
Tue, 06 Oct 2015 18:59:01 +0200 Added tag 3.19.13, debian/3.19.13-1, centos/3.19.13-1 for changeset f933a38d7ab5
Rémi Cardona <remi.cardona@logilab.fr> [Tue, 06 Oct 2015 18:59:01 +0200] rev 10630
Added tag 3.19.13, debian/3.19.13-1, centos/3.19.13-1 for changeset f933a38d7ab5
Tue, 06 Oct 2015 18:35:14 +0200 [pkg] 3.19.13 3.19.13 centos/3.19.13-1 debian/3.19.13-1
Rémi Cardona <remi.cardona@logilab.fr> [Tue, 06 Oct 2015 18:35:14 +0200] rev 10629
[pkg] 3.19.13
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 tip