testfunc/test/jstests/utils.js
author Aurelien Campeas <aurelien.campeas@logilab.fr>
Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:18:22 +0100
changeset 8735 5567a5117aeb
parent 7363 2293c49b290a
permissions -rw-r--r--
[entity] ensure the .related(entities=False) parameter is honored all the way down (closes #2755994) As of today, such a call will always fill the relation cache by calling .entities() on every single related rset entry. As a consequence, the `limit` parameter handling also had to be fixed. It was bogus in the following ways: * not used in the related_rql, hence potentially huge database requests, but also actually * foolishly used in the .entities()-calling cache routine we now bypass (this changeset ticket's main topic) Now: * we set a limit on the rql expression, and * forbid caching if given a non-None limit (as we don't want to make the cache handling code more complicated than it is already) With this, entity.unrelated gets a better limit implementation (so the code in related/unrelated is nice and symmetric) Risk: * _cw_relation_cache disappears completely, which is good, but this is Python, so you never know ...

function datetuple(d) {
    return [d.getFullYear(), d.getMonth()+1, d.getDate(),
	    d.getHours(), d.getMinutes()];
}

function pprint(obj) {
    print('{');
    for(k in obj) {
	print('  ' + k + ' = ' + obj[k]);
    }
    print('}');
}

function arrayrepr(array) {
    return '[' + array.join(', ') + ']';
}

function assertArrayEquals(array1, array2) {
    if (array1.length != array2.length) {
	throw new crosscheck.AssertionFailure(array1.join(', ') + ' != ' + array2.join(', '));
    }
    for (var i=0; i<array1.length; i++) {
	if (array1[i] != array2[i]) {

	    throw new crosscheck.AssertionFailure(arrayrepr(array1) + ' and ' + arrayrepr(array2)
						 + ' differs at index ' + i);
	}
    }
}