--- a/doc/book/en/annexes/rql/implementation.rst Fri Apr 16 14:39:42 2010 +0200
+++ b/doc/book/en/annexes/rql/implementation.rst Fri Apr 16 16:40:25 2010 +0200
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
Implementation
--------------
+
BNF grammar
~~~~~~~~~~~
@@ -126,7 +127,7 @@
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- The current implementation does not support linking two relations of type 'is'
- with a OR. I do not think that the negation is supported on this type of
+ with an OR. I do not think that the negation is supported on this type of
relation (XXX FIXME to be confirmed).
- Relations defining the variables must be left to those using them. For
@@ -140,11 +141,11 @@
is not.
-- missing proper explicit type conversion, COALESCE and certainly other things...
+- missing proper explicit type conversion, COALESCE and certainly other things...
-- writing a rql query require knowledge of the schema used (with real relation
- names and entities, not those viewing in the user interface). On the other
- hand, we can not really bypass that, and it is the job of a user interface to
+- writing an rql query requires knowledge of the used schema (with real relation
+ names and entities, not those viewed in the user interface). On the other
+ hand, we cannot really bypass that, and it is the job of a user interface to
hide the RQL.