.. _advanced_tutorial:

Building a photo gallery with CubicWeb

======================================

Desired features

----------------

* basically a photo gallery

* photo stored on the file system and displayed dynamically through a web interface

* navigation through folder (album), tags, geographical zone, people on the

  picture... using facets

* advanced security (not everyone can see everything). More on this later.

Cube creation and schema definition

-----------------------------------

.. _adv_tuto_create_new_cube:

Step 1: creating a new cube for my web site

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

One note about my development environment: I wanted to use the packaged

version of CubicWeb and cubes while keeping my cube in my user

directory, let's say `~src/cubes`.  I achieve this by setting the

following environment variables::

  CW_CUBES_PATH=~/src/cubes

  CW_MODE=user

I can now create the cube which will hold custom code for this web

site using::

  cubicweb-ctl newcube --directory=~/src/cubes sytweb

.. _adv_tuto_assemble_cubes:

Step 2: pick building blocks into existing cubes

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Almost everything I want to handle in my web-site is somehow already modelized in

existing cubes that I'll extend for my need. So I'll pick the following cubes:

* `folder`, containing the `Folder` entity type, which will be used as

  both 'album' and a way to map file system folders. Entities are

  added to a given folder using the `filed_under` relation.

* `file`, containing `File` and `Image` entity types, gallery view,

  and a file system import utility.

* `zone`, containing the `Zone` entity type for hierarchical geographical

  zones. Entities (including sub-zones) are added to a given zone using the

  `situated_in` relation.

* `person`, containing the `Person` entity type plus some basic views.

* `comment`, providing a full commenting system allowing one to comment entity types

  supporting the `comments` relation by adding a `Comment` entity.

* `tag`, providing a full tagging system as an easy and powerful way to classify

  entities supporting the `tags` relation by linking the to `Tag` entities. This

  will allows navigation into a large number of picture.

Ok, now I'll tell my cube requires all this by editing cubes/sytweb/__pkginfo__.py:

  .. sourcecode:: python

    __depends_cubes__ = {'file': '>= 1.2.0',

			 'folder': '>= 1.1.0',

			 'person': '>= 1.2.0',

			 'comment': '>= 1.2.0',

			 'tag': '>= 1.2.0',

			 'zone': None,

			 }

    __depends__ = {'cubicweb': '>= 3.5.10',

		   }

    for key,value in __depends_cubes__.items():

	__depends__['cubicweb-'+key] = value

    __use__ = tuple(__depends_cubes__)

Notice that you can express minimal version of the cube that should be used,

`None` meaning whatever version available.

Step 3: glue everything together in my cube's schema

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

.. sourcecode:: python

    from yams.buildobjs import RelationDefinition

    class comments(RelationDefinition):

	subject = 'Comment'

	object = ('File', 'Image')

	cardinality = '1*'

	composite = 'object'

    class tags(RelationDefinition):

	subject = 'Tag'

	object = ('File', 'Image')

    class filed_under(RelationDefinition):

	subject = ('File', 'Image')

	object = 'Folder'

    class situated_in(RelationDefinition):

	subject = 'Image'

	object = 'Zone'

    class displayed_on(RelationDefinition):

	subject = 'Person'

	object = 'Image'

This schema:

* allows to comment and tag on `File` and `Image` entity types by adding the

  `comments` and `tags` relations. This should be all we've to do for this

  feature since the related cubes provide 'pluggable section' which are

  automatically displayed on the primary view of entity types supporting the

  relation.

* adds a `situated_in` relation definition so that image entities can be

  geolocalized.

* add a new relation `displayed_on` relation telling who can be seen on a

  picture.

This schema will probably have to evolve as time goes (for security handling at

least), but since the possibility to let a schema evolve is one of CubicWeb's

features (and goals), we won't worry about it for now and see that later when needed.

Step 4: creating the instance

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Now that I have a schema, I want to create an instance. To

do so using this new 'sytweb' cube, I run::

  cubicweb-ctl create sytweb sytweb_instance

Hint: if you get an error while the database is initialized, you can

avoid having to answer the questions again by running::

   cubicweb-ctl db-create sytweb_instance

This will use your already configured instance and start directly from the create

database step, thus skipping questions asked by the 'create' command.

Once the instance and database are fully initialized, run ::

  cubicweb-ctl start sytweb_instance

to start the instance, check you can connect on it, etc...

Security, testing and migration

-------------------------------

This part will cover various topics:

* configuring security

* migrating existing instance

* writing some unit tests

Here is the ``read`` security model I want:

* folders, files, images and comments should have one of the following visibility:

  - ``public``, everyone can see it

  - ``authenticated``, only authenticated users can see it

  - ``restricted``, only a subset of authenticated users can see it

* managers (e.g. me) can see everything

* only authenticated users can see people

* everyone can see classifier entities, such as tag and zone

Also, unless explicitly specified, the visibility of an image should be the same as

its parent folder, as well as visibility of a comment should be the same as the

commented entity. If there is no parent entity, the default visibility is

``authenticated``.

Regarding write security, that's much easier:

* anonymous can't write anything

* authenticated users can only add comment

* managers will add the remaining stuff

Now, let's implement that!

Proper security in CubicWeb is done at the schema level, so you don't have to

bother with it in views: users will only see what they can see automatically.

.. _adv_tuto_security:

Step 1: configuring security into the schema

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In schema, you can grant access according to groups, or to some RQL expressions:

users get access if the expression returns some results. To implement the read

security defined earlier, groups are not enough, we'll need some RQL expression. Here

is the idea:

* add a `visibility` attribute on Folder, Image and Comment, which may be one of

  the value explained above

* add a `may_be_read_by` relation from Folder, Image and Comment to users,

  which will define who can see the entity

* security propagation will be done in hook.

So the first thing to do is to modify my cube's schema.py to define those

relations:

.. sourcecode:: python

    from yams.constraints import StaticVocabularyConstraint

    class visibility(RelationDefinition):

	subject = ('Folder', 'File', 'Image', 'Comment')

	object = 'String'

	constraints = [StaticVocabularyConstraint(('public', 'authenticated',

						   'restricted', 'parent'))]

	default = 'parent'

	cardinality = '11' # required

    class may_be_read_by(RelationDefinition):

	subject = ('Folder', 'File', 'Image', 'Comment',)

	object = 'CWUser'

We can note the following points:

* we've added a new `visibility` attribute to folder, file, image and comment

  using a `RelationDefinition`

* `cardinality = '11'` means this attribute is required. This is usually hidden

  under the `required` argument given to the `String` constructor, but we can

  rely on this here (same thing for StaticVocabularyConstraint, which is usually

  hidden by the `vocabulary` argument)

* the `parent` possible value will be used for visibility propagation

Now, we should be able to define security rules in the schema, based on these new

attribute and relation. Here is the code to add to *schema.py*:

.. sourcecode:: python

    from cubicweb.schema import ERQLExpression

    VISIBILITY_PERMISSIONS = {

	'read':   ('managers',

		   ERQLExpression('X visibility "public"'),

		   ERQLExpression('X may_be_read_by U')),

	'add':    ('managers',),

	'update': ('managers', 'owners',),

	'delete': ('managers', 'owners'),

	}

    AUTH_ONLY_PERMISSIONS = {

	    'read':   ('managers', 'users'),

	    'add':    ('managers',),

	    'update': ('managers', 'owners',),

	    'delete': ('managers', 'owners'),

	    }

    CLASSIFIERS_PERMISSIONS = {

	    'read':   ('managers', 'users', 'guests'),

	    'add':    ('managers',),

	    'update': ('managers', 'owners',),

	    'delete': ('managers', 'owners'),

	    }

    from cubes.folder.schema import Folder

    from cubes.file.schema import File, Image

    from cubes.comment.schema import Comment

    from cubes.person.schema import Person

    from cubes.zone.schema import Zone

    from cubes.tag.schema import Tag

    Folder.__permissions__ = VISIBILITY_PERMISSIONS

    File.__permissions__ = VISIBILITY_PERMISSIONS

    Image.__permissions__ = VISIBILITY_PERMISSIONS

    Comment.__permissions__ = VISIBILITY_PERMISSIONS.copy()

    Comment.__permissions__['add'] = ('managers', 'users',)

    Person.__permissions__ = AUTH_ONLY_PERMISSIONS

    Zone.__permissions__ = CLASSIFIERS_PERMISSIONS

    Tag.__permissions__ = CLASSIFIERS_PERMISSIONS

What's important in there:

* `VISIBILITY_PERMISSIONS` provides read access to managers group, if

  `visibility` attribute's value is 'public', or if user (designed by the 'U'

  variable in the expression) is linked to the entity (the 'X' variable) through

  the `may_read` permission

* we modify permissions of the entity types we use by importing them and

  modifying their `__permissions__` attribute

* notice the `.copy()`: we only want to modify 'add' permission for `Comment`,

  not for all entity types using `VISIBILITY_PERMISSIONS`!

* the remaining part of the security model is done using regular groups:

  - `users` is the group to which all authenticated users will belong

  - `guests` is the group of anonymous users

.. _adv_tuto_security_propagation:

Step 2: security propagation in hooks

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To fullfill the requirements, we have to implement::

  Also, unless explicity specified, visibility of an image should be the same as

  its parent folder, as well as visibility of a comment should be the same as the

  commented entity.

This kind of `active` rule will be done using CubicWeb's hook

system. Hooks are triggered on database event such as addition of new

entity or relation.

The tricky part of the requirement is in *unless explicitly specified*, notably

because when the entity is added, we don't know yet its 'parent'

entity (e.g. Folder of an Image, Image commented by a Comment). To handle such things,

CubicWeb provides `Operation`, which allow to schedule things to do at commit time.

In our case we will:

* on entity creation, schedule an operation that will set default visibility

* when a "parent" relation is added, propagate parent's visibility unless the

  child already has a visibility set

Here is the code in cube's *hooks.py*:

.. sourcecode:: python

    from cubicweb.selectors import is_instance

    from cubicweb.server import hook

    class SetVisibilityOp(hook.Operation):

	def precommit_event(self):

	    for eid in self.session.transaction_data.pop('pending_visibility'):

		entity = self.session.entity_from_eid(eid)

		if entity.visibility == 'parent':

		    entity.set_attributes(visibility=u'authenticated')

    class SetVisibilityHook(hook.Hook):

	__regid__ = 'sytweb.setvisibility'

	__select__ = hook.Hook.__select__ & is_instance('Folder', 'File', 'Image', 'Comment')

	events = ('after_add_entity',)

	def __call__(self):

	    hook.set_operation(self._cw, 'pending_visibility', self.entity.eid,

			       SetVisibilityOp)

    class SetParentVisibilityHook(hook.Hook):

	__regid__ = 'sytweb.setparentvisibility'

	__select__ = hook.Hook.__select__ & hook.match_rtype('filed_under', 'comments')

	events = ('after_add_relation',)

	def __call__(self):

	    parent = self._cw.entity_from_eid(self.eidto)

	    child = self._cw.entity_from_eid(self.eidfrom)

	    if child.visibility == 'parent':

		child.set_attributes(visibility=parent.visibility)

Notice:

* hooks are application objects, hence have selectors that should match entity or

  relation types to which the hook applies. To match a relation type, we use the

  hook specific `match_rtype` selector.

* usage of `set_operation`: instead of adding an operation for each added entity,

  set_operation allows to create a single one and to store entity's eids to be

  processed in session's transaction data. This is a good pratice to avoid heavy

  operations manipulation cost when creating a lot of entities in the same

  transaction.

* the `precommit_event` method of the operation will be called at transaction's

  commit time.

* in a hook, `self._cw` is the repository session, not a web request as usually

  in views

* according to hook's event, you have access to different attributes on the hook

  instance. Here:

  - `self.entity` is the newly added entity on 'after_add_entity' events

  - `self.eidfrom` / `self.eidto` are the eid of the subject / object entity on

    'after_add_relatiohn' events (you may also get the relation type using

    `self.rtype`)

The `parent` visibility value is used to tell "propagate using parent security"

because we want that attribute to be required, so we can't use None value else

we'll get an error before we get any chance to propagate...

Now, we also want to propagate the `may_be_read_by` relation. Fortunately,

CubicWeb provides some base hook classes for such things, so we only have to add

the following code to *hooks.py*:

.. sourcecode:: python

    # relations where the "parent" entity is the subject

    S_RELS = set()

    # relations where the "parent" entity is the object

    O_RELS = set(('filed_under', 'comments',))

    class AddEntitySecurityPropagationHook(hook.PropagateSubjectRelationHook):

	"""propagate permissions when new entity are added"""

	__regid__ = 'sytweb.addentity_security_propagation'

	__select__ = (hook.PropagateSubjectRelationHook.__select__

		      & hook.match_rtype_sets(S_RELS, O_RELS))

	main_rtype = 'may_be_read_by'

	subject_relations = S_RELS

	object_relations = O_RELS

    class AddPermissionSecurityPropagationHook(hook.PropagateSubjectRelationAddHook):

	"""propagate permissions when new entity are added"""

	__regid__ = 'sytweb.addperm_security_propagation'

	__select__ = (hook.PropagateSubjectRelationAddHook.__select__

		      & hook.match_rtype('may_be_read_by',))

	subject_relations = S_RELS

	object_relations = O_RELS

    class DelPermissionSecurityPropagationHook(hook.PropagateSubjectRelationDelHook):

	__regid__ = 'sytweb.delperm_security_propagation'

	__select__ = (hook.PropagateSubjectRelationDelHook.__select__

		      & hook.match_rtype('may_be_read_by',))

	subject_relations = S_RELS

	object_relations = O_RELS

* the `AddEntitySecurityPropagationHook` will propagate the relation

  when `filed_under` or `comments` relations are added

  - the `S_RELS` and `O_RELS` set as well as the `match_rtype_sets` selector are

    used here so that if my cube is used by another one, it'll be able to

    configure security propagation by simply adding relation to one of the two

    sets.

* the two others will propagate permissions changes on parent entities to

  children entities

.. _adv_tuto_tesing_security:

Step 3: testing our security

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Security is tricky. Writing some tests for it is a very good idea. You should

even write them first, as Test Driven Development recommends!

Here is a small test case that will check the basis of our security

model, in *test/unittest_sytweb.py*:

.. sourcecode:: python

    from cubicweb.devtools.testlib import CubicWebTC

    from cubicweb import Binary

    class SecurityTC(CubicWebTC):

	def test_visibility_propagation(self):

	    # create a user for later security checks

	    toto = self.create_user('toto')

	    # init some data using the default manager connection

	    req = self.request()

	    folder = req.create_entity('Folder',

				       name=u'restricted',

				       visibility=u'restricted')

	    photo1 = req.create_entity('Image',

				       data_name=u'photo1.jpg',

				       data=Binary('xxx'),

				       filed_under=folder)

	    self.commit()

	    photo1.clear_all_caches() # good practice, avoid request cache effects

	    # visibility propagation

	    self.assertEquals(photo1.visibility, 'restricted')

	    # unless explicitly specified

	    photo2 = req.create_entity('Image',

				       data_name=u'photo2.jpg',

				       data=Binary('xxx'),

				       visibility=u'public',

				       filed_under=folder)

	    self.commit()

	    self.assertEquals(photo2.visibility, 'public')

	    # test security

	    self.login('toto')

	    req = self.request()

	    self.assertEquals(len(req.execute('Image X')), 1) # only the public one

	    self.assertEquals(len(req.execute('Folder X')), 0) # restricted...

	    # may_be_read_by propagation

	    self.restore_connection()

	    folder.set_relations(may_be_read_by=toto)

	    self.commit()

	    photo1.clear_all_caches()

	    self.failUnless(photo1.may_be_read_by)

	    # test security with permissions

	    self.login('toto')

	    req = self.request()

	    self.assertEquals(len(req.execute('Image X')), 2) # now toto has access to photo2

	    self.assertEquals(len(req.execute('Folder X')), 1) # and to restricted folder

    if __name__ == '__main__':

	from logilab.common.testlib import unittest_main